Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Code of civil procedure 1908

(Querist) 14 April 2017 This query is : Resolved 
Respected experts
Provisions Rule 8 and rule 11 of order 33 seems to contradictory
Rule 8 give exemptions from paying court fee or fee for process while rule 11 says that if the suit dismissed because the summon for the defendant to appear has not been severed upon consequence of failure of plaintiff to pay the court fee or postal charges for such services.

My question is that if he is indigent person considered by court then why his suit dismissed under rule 11 clause (a) ?
ADV-JEEVAN PATIL, MUMBAI (Expert) 15 April 2017
Indigent person is not absolve court fees if legally mandatory.
laxman rohit (Querist) 15 April 2017
But sir under rule 8 of order 33 if application to sue as an indigent person admitted then it is mandatory to exempt from court fee or fee for service of process.
Then how it can be ground of dismissal as given under clause (a) of rule 11 of order 33
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 15 April 2017
This is an academic query which is not attended in this particular section for the poor litigants. Raise this intellect issue in forum section of this site.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :