Public servent manipulated the roznama
deepak
(Querist) 06 May 2012
This query is : Resolved
First of all, very thanks to all experts.
This is the addition to my privious query "Public servent manipulated roznama" asked on 4/19/2012 7:43:47 PM
Privious Query is :
1. Plaintiff appealed in revenue S.D.O. office.
2. In that, Clerk gave next hearing date 20-3-12 to dependent that time plentiff was absent.
3. But when the dependent was present on given date 20-3-12, the clerk told him that, today is not your hearing day and your previous date absentee laid on roznama.
4. Dependent does not know about that previous date because clerk manipulated the dt 20-3-12 to 2-3-12, and it is very clear in roznama copy.
5. Clerk did this dishonestly, fraudulently in favour of plaintiff, because that day's hearing dependent could not be present.
Then what charges frame in that case according to IPC such as section 119, 166, 167, 218. Please help me
Defendant followed Mr. Raj kumar Makkad advice.
1.Defendant brought the facts in the notice of S.D.O. then the S.D.O. told him whatever you have to say, you can speak on next hearing date. But next two hearing dates S.D.O. is busy in government work and the same is recorded in the Roznama.
2.Yesterday's hearing date
2a.Defendant again brought the facts in the notice of the S.D.O., and demanded to restore the case as it on the hearing date when the manipulation was happened.
2b.But the S.D.O. said all is well, and recorded the hearing in the Roznama "both parties' arguments are over, case is closed for judgement". Judgement date was not recorded in the Roznama (it is unlawful, can he do like that?). And told to defendant to sign on the Roznama.
2c.Defendant refuses to sign and said to S.D.O. my argument is not over. And ask when was the plaintiff complete his argument? I want the copy of plaintiff's arguments. S.D.O. rejected the demand. And make remark in Roznama that defendant refused to sign in Roznama.
Now, what evidence the defendant has?
Roznama copy of all the hearing date, which is clearly shows
a.the manipulation that I have already said. (Please refer to my privious query)
b.plaintiff no.2's presentee and signature with date 17-2-12 above the same date line. That day the said manipulation was happened. That day plaintiff no.2 was not present on time of Pukara.
c.Judgement date was not recorded in the Roznama. Because S.D.O.'s intention is defendant could not take judgement copy on time.
d.Remark of S.D.O. that defendant refused to sign in Roznama.
Now my questions are,
1.Is it I.P.C. 420 case along with I.P.C. Sections 119, 166, 167, 218.
2.Is there any CrPC section for this case?
3.Is the certified copy of Roznama, the sufficient evidence to prove the charges in this case?
4.Is F.I.R. lodge against S.D.O. or the S.D.O. staff.
5.what is the CrPC section to sieze the case file? so that no one can remove or change the evidences from the case file.
6.what will the defence of S.D.O.?
ajay sethi
(Expert) 06 May 2012
since the case has been adjourned wait for judgement . it is your case that areguments have not been completed and it is wrongly recorded on roznama .
you cna go in appeal aginst impugned order passed by SDO wherein you emtnion that no arguments have taken place and it is wrongly recorded in roznama . appellate court will set aside impugned order
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 06 May 2012
Our court procedure have very serious Lacuna, and corrupted court staff changes dates, as dates are neither given in writing to litigants, nor available ON LINE, DUE TO DELAY IN FEEDING DATA.
Many innocent Litigant have to suffer. Once Judge sign Roznama, matter is over.
Roznama is written at the end of the day. I have instances, Roznama not written for months, and later manipulated . BUY THEM !!
THIS IS ONE MORE EXAMPLE OF THE LACUNAS I PUBLISHED EARLIER.
MAJORITY OF TRIAL COURT BENCH CLERKS EARNS A LOT, DOING ALL THESE, AND INNOCENT PERSON, A VICTIM , IS PUNISHED IN COURT.
It is a setting of Local Advocates & Court Clerks.
deepak
(Querist) 06 May 2012
Sub Divisional Officer acts are in question.
plaintiff submitted xerox copy of civil court order along with appeal. Defendant wants certified copy of that xerox copy whatever the plaintiff submitted. Revenue Sub Divisional Officer refused the demand and said he cannot certify the court order. you can get it from court. But defendant most need is, that copy which is submitted by the plaintiff.
the fact is
It is a xerox copy of court order which someone brought for plaintiff,
following details are given on the first page of that copy i.e.
Application no.
Application Dt.
copy is for:
name of the applicant who applied on behalf of plaintiff
copy ready Dt.
copy issued Dt.
though it is the xerox copy of court order submitted by Plaintiff along with the appeal, defendant's right to get the certified copy of that, whatever it is. what should defendant do?
Please give advice on criminal aspect of this case.
Shonee Kapoor
(Expert) 07 May 2012
Deepak,
You can always apply for certifieed copy of the same,.
Regards,
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
