Clarity reqired for difference b/w techno legal terms for praying declaratory decree
siri
(Querist) 18 November 2011
This query is : Resolved
Please clarify whether below mentioned relief prayers by plantiff attracts court fee as per PERMANENT INJUCTION OR as per TITLE DECLARATION & also tell out of below 6 points,which point has more weightage for Plantiff to get absolute ownership for his property without praying Title declaration
1)PLZ give declaratory decree of permanent injuction in favour of plantiff against defendant so that plantiff becomes absolute owner for mentioned scheduled property
2)PLZ give declaratory decree of permanent injuction in favour of plantiff for his peaceful enjoyment against defendant so that plantiff becomes absolute owner for mentioned schedule property
3)PLZ give declaratory decree of permanent injuction against defendant for restricting him not to disturb plantiff peaceful enjoyment of mentioned schedule property so that plantiff becomes absolute owner for mentioned schedule property
4)That by passing: declaratory decree in favour of plaintiff and against the defendant the plaintiff is the absolute owner and in possession of mentioned scheduled property.
5)That by passing: declaratory decree of permanent injuction in favour of plaintiff and against the defendant the plaintiff is the absolute owner and in possession of mentioned scheduled property
6)That by passing: declaratory decree of permanent injuction in favour of plaintiff and against the defendant the plaintiff becomes the absolute owner and in possession of mentioned scheduled property
If above 6 points is not good then give correct Techno legal terms for praying decree of injuction which attracts nominal court fee but getting Absolute ownership on said property to plantiff with out praying Title declaration in court
J K Agrawal
(Expert) 20 November 2011
All the Six attracts ad volrem Court fee.
Just seek PI only.
Following is sufficient.
PLZ give decree of permanent injuction in favour of plantiff for his peaceful enjoyment against defendant.
