Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Provident fund deduction from salary of employee

(Querist) 12 September 2011 This query is : Resolved 
Dear sir,

my question is whether P.F. deduction is liability under Provident fund act or any other act on the part of company if employee's basic salary exceeds maximum ceiling limit of Rs. 6500 & employee does not want to make provident fund deduct from his salary.

whether P.f. should be deducted by company or not? please sir, reply it as far as possible.
Advocate Rajkumarlaxman (Expert) 12 September 2011
(i) Employer's liability to deduct employee's contribution
arises before paying wages to employees (and not
as and when wages are earned by employees) in respect of
any period or part of period. Thus the employees' contribution
comes in the hands of the employer during the
wage disbursal month and not during the wage period
(which may be a calender month or any other period and
not necessarily a period equal to one month.)

Under the EPF and ESIC Acts, the Principle Employer is liable for the compliance of the Immediate Employer /Contractor. It is good that the contractors are complying with the provisions of EPF and ESIC Acts under the respective Codes. But what is important is the proof of regular compliance by these contractors.

Advocate Rajkumarlaxman (Expert) 12 September 2011
The Supreme Court has stated in Andhra University v. R.P.F.C. 1985 (51) FLR 605
(SC) that in construing the provisions of the Employees Provident Funds and
Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952, it has to be borne in mind that it is a beneficent piece
of social welfare legislation aimed at promoting and securing the well-being of the
employees and the court will not adopt a narrow interpretation which will have the effect
of defeating the very object and purpose the Act. The preamble to the Act also states that
this is an Act to provide for the institution of:
(i) Provident Funds
(ii) Pension Fund and
(iii) Deposit Linked Insurance Fund
for employees in factories and other establishments. It is with this background that one
must interpret the various provisions of the Act and the Scheme related to it.
Applicability
The Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952 applies to the
whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir (Section 2). This Act applies
(Section 3) to:
Advocate Rajkumarlaxman (Expert) 12 September 2011
• Contractor’s Employees: It has been held by the court in Enfield India v RPFC 2000
(85) FLR 519 (Mad) a person doing work of the principal employer, even though
employed by a contractor is also an employee covered by the definition.
• “Excluded Employee” has been defined in para 2(f) to mean an employee:
(i) who having been a member of the fund, withdrew the full amount of his
accumulations on retirement or emigration or
(ii) whose pay at the time he is otherwise entitled to become a member of the fund
exceeds Rs. 6,500.00 p.m.
K.S.Srinivas (Expert) 12 September 2011
As per PF Act 1952, ceiling limit is6500/M i.e. (Basic+DA) of an employee.

If the employee’s emoluments exceed6,500/- per month, he has the option to join the Scheme(s) with the consent of employer.

Employee Status:-

If Employee is already member of PF Scheme.

Emoluments :-
1. Up to 6500/M (Basic +DA) -Mandatory @ 12% of Basic +DA.
2. 6501/- & above (Basic +DA)
A.Mandatory @12% up to 6500/M.
B.Above 6500/M it’s up the organization & its policy.

If Employee is not member of PF Scheme or New Entrant.

Emoluments :-
1. Up to 6500/M (Basic +DA) -Mandatory @ 12% of Basic +DA.
2. 6501/- & above (Basic +DA) - It’s not Mandatory, but generally in the interest of employees organizations cover their employees under the scheme.


prabhakar singh (Expert) 13 September 2011
experts have rightly guided you,i agree with them.
Guest (Expert) 13 September 2011
I totally agree with Shri K.S. Srinivas.
M/s. Y-not legal services (Expert) 13 September 2011
Am also agree with mr.k.s.s as well as with laxman sir also..
girish shringi (Expert) 14 September 2011
I do agree with the experts.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :