partition
mahesan
(Querist) 19 December 2010
This query is : Resolved
properties allottd to father in the year of 1953 as per parttiion deed, Son and father sold without knowledge of duaghters in the year of 1986, But revenue records like stands in the name of Daughters and subsequent purchaser.
Daughters are entitled to share in the said properties? What sares they entitled?
R.Ramachandran
(Expert) 19 December 2010
When the property was allotted to father in the year 1953 and sold in the year 1986, how the revenue records would be in the name of Daughters?
This needs clarification in the first place before any further view could be given.
Uma parameswaran
(Expert) 19 December 2010
There might be some conveyance happened in the name of Daughter in between 1953 and 1986.
s.subramanian
(Expert) 19 December 2010
Query lacks important details.
Y V Vishweshwar Rao
(Expert) 19 December 2010
The fact mentioned in the Query that the Daughters name is recorded in the Revenue Records as owner and father & Son sold the property of daughter in the year 1986. One fold is that The property in the name of Daughter is sold by others / father & Son - who are not owners , it is for the owner / daughter to dispute the Sale with in a reasonable time allowed by law of limitation - from the date of knowledge.
The second Fold is that the Partition in the year 1953 father got ancestral property and father & son sold in the year 1986 - it is beyond limitation time and also much before 2005 Hindu Succession Act Amendment . The Daughter may not get any share in view of non availability of Joint Family property as on the date of 2005 Amendment Act .
G. ARAVINTHAN
(Expert) 19 December 2010
yes i agree with Subramanian..
More details required
Advocate. Arunagiri
(Expert) 19 December 2010
It is not possible to give opinion without relevant details.
sanjeev murthy desai
(Expert) 20 December 2010
1. Revenue documents are not title documents and those are supporting documents for title. Hence it is advisable to file a application for delete the daughters names in the revenue records.
2. Daughters not entitled any rights because of rights are bar by Limitation.
Pritam Saini, Advocate
(Expert) 20 December 2010
verified the revenue record and its base by which name of daughters reflected in revenue record,otherwise no value of revenue record if it is without any basis.
