Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Restatement of service

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 23 September 2010 This query is : Resolved 
I have an query regarding Crpc411. I want to ask you that when a person is removed from the charge of Crpc 411 by the Judge But after the removal from this section his employer conduct one sided enquiry official enquiry, Their finding is that amount is unclaimed by him that shows he is guilty,and first they reinstated and then removed from the service.

He went to the Allahabad high court & the court said that because of not claming the amount you seemms to be guilty and decided in favour of his office.

MY point is that if a person is removed from the charge of 411 the why he should claim the amount and what is the chance of this case in Supreme court.
R.Ramachandran (Expert) 23 September 2010
Section 411 of the IPC (not CrPC as mentioned by you) relates to "Dishonestly receiving stolen property". When you say "amount is unclaimed by him", what amount you are talking about? Your query is not clear.
Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 23 September 2010
Thak you very much Mr. R.Ramchandran for your quick reply.

amount means the Gaban(don't know english word) money from the office.
Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 23 September 2010
Not clear to me. What do you mean by removed by the judge.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :






Course