Application u/s 411 cr.pc dismissed by sdm, revision is maintainable in session court?

tarun (Querist) 19 October 2011 This query is : Resolved
hello friends,
executive magistrate SDM issued a notice to us u/s 145(1) crpc, and after appearing in this case, we filed written statement along with an application u/s 411 crpc that SDM is a party against us in a criminal petition pending in punjab and haryana high court chandigarh, and he should not hear this case u/s 145(1) being a party in high court against us, which is based upon the same facts directly related to this case u/s 145 crpc and any decision taken by him should be biased and one sided and against the merits of the case as he is litigent against us in a case based upon same facts of case u/s 145 crpc, but he dismissed the application on the ground that it is baseless, now we filed a revision against said order of dismissal of sdm of our application u/s 411 crpc, now opposite lawyer is saying that this order was interlocutory and revision against this is not maintainable, so plz give me judgements/authorities that revision against this order of dismissing application u/s 411 crpc is maintainable

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 19 October 2011
Revision against interlocutory order of that nature is very much maintainable either before the sessions court or before the high court.

Biswanath Roy (Expert) 19 October 2011
Revision against interlocutory order validly lies. I need say that legal experts cannotact as case law supplier like record supplier in a office.

Biswanath Roy (Expert) 19 October 2011
Revision against the interlocutory order validly lies. I need to add that legal experts cannot act as a case law supplier like record supplier in the office.