Nagarajan Arumugam
01 May 2024 at 18:36
I have purchased a property through MSTCE E-auction from a nationalized bank in 2020, document registered, revenue records and TNEB services are updated. Through CJM court property handed taken over by bank 2021 further handed over to me. Property renovation and a building with panchayat approval is constructed. While renting out, the loan borrower from the bank lock break open and entered premises and taken control of whole property.
I do made complaint to local police then and there, now they inform it is civil case, need court order again to vacate the intruders. Kindly advise the best way to get back my property and also peaceful possession
Anonymous
26 April 2024 at 00:12
I have filed a petition before the HIgh court for quashing. However there were 3 pages which were a bit blur and i dont have additional copies of the same.
This 3 were the screenshot of messages filed with the chargesheet and the one in chargesheet is itself blur
Please suggest, the best course of action.
Can i just remove those which are a part of chargesheet as its not really relevant for determining the ingredients of offence
Anonymous
26 April 2024 at 00:09
S311 of CrPC - Is it on Oath and can the judge record in writing the statement of witnesses.
Anonymous
25 April 2024 at 00:48
I am big time confused. Recently the Hon'ble Session Court in a petition u/s 340 of CrPC for Perjury took action by filing a written complainant against the opposite side.
To clarify, once the judge makes a written complaint, it will send it to First Class Judicial Magistrate for Trial Proceedings.
But before he does that, I want to invoke S311 of CrPC and examine witnesses on Oath. I am not sure if S311 permits recording of statement of witnesses on Oath and that's my first question.
If suppose the above question is answered in negative, then I plan to invoke S311 read with S202 or 200 of CrPC to get the statements of witnesses recorded on Oath.
Eventually my goal is to get this witnesses examined before the court and get their statements recorded on Oath so that they are binded with those statements.
Please advice
mohamed sulthanapa
19 April 2024 at 13:45
Yesterday i went to my friend house at koyambedu Chennai, my house is at thirumullaivoyal. "Blink It App" staffs came to my friend house and told they are giving offer discount for downloading the app. They also asked me to download the blinkit app. They guaranteed product delivery in 10 minutes. I told them that i will download the app only if they have service at thirumullaivoyal. They told services are available at thirumullaivoyal. So i downloaded the app. They told they give Rs. 50 off on purchase of minimum Rs. 200. They told they will deliver within 10 min. I ordered and got the product at my friend house at koyambedu. Today i came to my house at thirumullaivoyal and tried the app. Its showing services unavailable in thirumullaivoyal. I m cheated by the blinkit staff. How should i take legal action on blinkit company. Thank you.
Anonymous
17 April 2024 at 00:18
Respected Experts,
A partnership firm issued a cheque in the name of the firm, with one person signing it. However, the account associated with the cheque was jointly opened by the firm. Due to the absence of the second signature, the cheque was dishonored. Can I file a Section 138 case against both the partnership firm and the individual who signed the cheque?
Anonymous
15 April 2024 at 18:30
Notice u/s 138 of NI Act is issued to co., only. There is no single word of that, it is represented by Managing Director. Complaint is also filed same. In my opinion complaint is not maintainable without directors are parties
Kindly reply me and if any citations please let me know.
Anonymous
14 April 2024 at 01:47
I need a clarification on a cheque bounce case.
I have sent around 15 lakh to my friend for his business purpose by taking a loan on my name . He started paying the emi regularly by sending the emi amount to me for an year. The emi was sent to me by his wife, mother and from his business and personal account. After an year he stopped paying the EMI. He stopped to respond my phone calls and his parents were also refused to pay the emi back.
I have raised a police complaint in our local police station. After the complaint my opponent gave me two cheques of 5 lakhs.
Then he stopped the payment and my both of the cheque got bounced. Now he raised a complaint to the police superiors that the local police inspector and DSP have threatened him to get the cheque from him.
But that is not the truth. As I have done the transaction through netbanking, he was not able to prove he didn’t receive any money from me. So that he gave us the cheque.
Now I have sent the legal notice twice as per the process. I received a reply that he was threatened by police to lend me the cheque. So this will not be under 138 NIA.
Now we have the
1. Bank statement which points the transferred amount of 15 lakhs,
2. Cheque and the return memo
3. Acknowledgment for the notice sent to the opponent.
Now pls let me know if there are any chances that the opponent can prove him as innocent.
And let me know the chances of winning the case.
Member Strength 9,49,037 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Letter writing - suggestion
Furthermore, the situation escalated when the individual responsible for these criminal acts forcefully entered my property 9 pm on xx-Jan-2024, broke open locks, and unlawfully seized control of the premises. Despite promptly reporting these incidents to the local police Inspector Mr. Tharamangalam Police station and called 100, and Police officials, Mr. SSI and Mr. responded to the scene but failed to take appropriate action to address the criminal activity unfolding before them. no effective action was taken to apprehend the trespasser or prevent further unlawful occupation.