Dipanwita Kali
04 November 2009 at 11:44
Hello,
I would like to know if contents from wikipedia can be copied as is from wikipedia? Contents can be diagrams, paragraphs.
I got the below information on the internet. But if someone can tell me in layman's terms WHAT EXACTLY NEEDS TO BE DONE TO PROTECT MYSELF FROM COPYRIGHT VIOLATION BEFORE TAKING CONTENT FROM WIKI, it would be great.
Wikipedia's textual content is copyrighted, but you may reuse it under the terms of our licensing requirements, summarized below.
Text in Wikipedia, excluding quotations, has been released under the GNU Free Documentation License (or is in the public domain), and can therefore be reused only if you release any derived work under the GFDL. This requires that, among other things, you attribute the authors and allow others to freely copy your work. (This is a summary, see the licence text for the exact details.)
If you are unwilling or unable to use the GFDL for your work, use of Wikipedia content is unauthorized. Small quotations of Wikipedia content, with its source attributed, may be permissible under the "fair use" clause of U.S. copyright law. See Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia for information about the proper citation of articles. No permission is needed to create a hyperlink to Wikipedia or its articles.
Images used in Wikipedia may have their own, completely independent licensing scheme. Looking at an image's description page by clicking on the image itself should ideally tell you the copyright status of the image. Many images are either in the public domain or licensed under copyleft licenses (such as the GFDL), but many are copyrighted and used on Wikipedia under the "fair use" clause of U.S. copyright law.
Muntazir e qanoon
08 September 2009 at 20:25
Dear sir,1)If a multistate organization denied promotion or given conditional promotion( to take outstation posting)to those staff who have good marks (90 and above marks)and given promotion to the staff who got less marks(less than 40 marks) and posted at mumbai or choice of theirs.because they are nearer and dearer of the chairman and director the jr.officer exam were held somewhere in year 2002-03.2)so many staff who have completed more than 5 years not promoted yet from jr.officer to sr. Officer as per policy while some of chairman and director 's special men got promotion in 3 years only while in jr.officers exam they got very less marks.this discrimination will justified if not than what staff can do individualy because union is puppet of management.which law and act will apply if any staff will file a suit against bank how much time the court will take to finalise the matter.is there any govt authority where staff can complaint against this injustification.if possible please give refarence of any court's judgement.your reply is eagerly waiting and highly appreciated.pl.reply email gls.2006@indiatimes.comriven
Rompalli V.B. Swamy
14 July 2009 at 18:21
What are the labour laws / acts applicable to a Trust ?
Hi,Dear all experts..
I got 5 yr hr generalist exp. But now im in a new environment, that is a Hospital which is under Milk Producers, Education and Medical Welfare Trust.
Management does not contribute to anything other than EPF. It seems they got an exemption to ESI. Further, I would like to confirm what are the labour laws / acts / employment terms applicable to a trust hospital when compared to ap shops & establishment and factories act such as gratuity, bonus, exgratia, group insurance, workmen compensation, service pay, notice, notice pay, probationary period, etc.,
please clarify at the earliest, preferably please reply to me at rvbs2@yahoo.com
Sharad Tripathi
09 July 2009 at 10:56
Hi,
I'm practising as an advocate for taxation matters (income tax and VAT etc.).
My query is that if a bill is being issued by me to my client, stating seperately, such works as, preparation of books of accounts,i.e.Cash book, ledger etc. and also preparation of balance sheet etc on letter head /bill of advocate wether this is a voilation of code of conduct/professional ethics or not.Can i mention these works in my bill seperately or not.
Member Strength 9,48,128 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
legal consequences of principal empoyeers
Respected Raj kumar Sir,
Thanks for giving your valuable advise.
1.Please tell about the rule position of said exemption of defense estblishments. if, any notification issued by the GOI in this regard and date of notification, as the ALC (C) is not co opreating with us.
2.Nowhere, in the ACT mentionted this exemption clause and where it was notified.
3.Please eduate me on the a/m points.
4. With out being registered ,if principal empolyeer issued form v, then any penal provisions attracted aganist the Govt est.(defense Est.)
Thanking you once again Sir