Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   21 June 2018 at 01:33

Suggestion required as to evidences in sec 498 a

Hi,
My marriage was solemnized in June 2015 as per Hindu Marriage Act and the girl stayed only for 2 months with me.
One day, during Aug 2015, she has left to her home without any information (while I was in office).
Two weeks passed and there was no trace of her and even when I called her parents and herself, they had switched off their mobiles.
One fine night in Sep, they had invited us for a dinner and on the pretext of some friendly discussion, they had started abusing my father by filthy language and started making false and concocted allegations against me and family.
They had even recorded the entire conversation in a mobile and even used the whatsapp messages exchanged between me and my wife (which were only the usage of American slangs, and use of words such as pig/donkey, etc) and made a false police complaint and made a fake case of sec 498 A. and started demanding ransom

My question is how far these evidences be considered as "evidences" against me and my family while giving judgment.
The case is at BW/NBW stage?

Anonymous   21 June 2018 at 00:53

Advice-regarding land dispute

sir, हमारे परोसी के साथ झड़प हो गया था ३०.४.१८ को जमीं विवाद को लेकर जिसमे हमारे तरप से तीन लोग इंजर्ड हो गया जिसमे एक रिस्तेदार बिच बचाव करने के लिए आगे आए उसके सर पर डंडे से वर किया गया सर में ७ टाके डॉक्टर ने किया दूसरे तरफ से भी तीन लोग इंजर्ड हुआ उसमे एक का सर में ५ टाके आए अब डॉक्टर ने रिपोर्ट दिया प्रेसर में आकर की दूसरे पक्ष का इंजरी जाएदा हैं पुलिस भी मिला हुआ हैं क्योंकि दूसरे पक्ष का अप्रोच आगे तक हैं पुलिस ने धारा ३०७ लगा दिया हैं हम लोगो पर जिसमे से एक आदमी को गिरफ्तार कर लिया गया हैं अब

Read more at: http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/modify_message.asp?entry_id=840481

Anonymous   21 June 2018 at 00:26

Change of date of birth in ssc and hsc marksheets

Hello,i am suraj.my original date of birth is 8/5/2001 but in ssc and hsc board certificate it is 8/5/2000.please tell me how can i change this date and solve this problem.please help me to secure my future.please reply fast.

Member (Account Deleted)   20 June 2018 at 23:58

Re-agricultural land

Dear sir/Madam Good Day & Greetings Myself only son to my father and he is having one elder brother who has no children.My father is having 06 acres land with patta,my pattern uncle-06 acres with patta,grandfather having-3.45 acres with patta passbook.My grandfather has expired twelve years ago then without information to us and consent of my father 3.45 acres of passbook transferred to grandmother by pattern uncle and he even got crop loan.Even a single paisa has not given to us in that .Later six years back my grandmother also expired,but till now 3.45 acres not divided by him and refusing to transfer land to us as existing loan to be paid.This total land was divided in randomly i:e; not sequentially partitioned, one portion to my father,other to them Note:This land is my great grandfather's not earned by my father/pattern uncle.Recently my father also expired. Even though he is not having children he is troubling us ,I think I will be legal inheritance to both my grandmother & father brother property. Please suggest how to proceed legally. There is no will and it is joint survey number of land.I want to know how i can stop him not to sale land.Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards

Anonymous   20 June 2018 at 23:37

Helpppppp

Sir and madam, My fan wiring burst and that is why I filed case in consumer fora. My case out of 6 parties, one is fan company owner by name crompton greaves. Another 5 parties are, 1 seller who sold the fan. parties 3, 4 , 5, 6 are KPTCL officers and workers. KPTCL is Karnataka Power transmissoin corporation limted. Part 1 and 2 appeared but did not file any reply for 90 days. On 90th day one advocate appeared and told he will file vakalath and objections. I gave a memo stating that as per NCRDC guidlines and supreme court guidelines only 45 days maximum time limit for opposite party to file reply from date of issue of notice. Here is HON SC guidelines "The Supreme Court held that the District Forum can grant a further period of 15 days in addition to the 30 days (from the date of notice) provided for in section 13 of the Act to the opposite party for filing his version or reply and not beyond that. It was held that the view expressed by the three Judge Bench of this Court in Dr. J.J. Merchant & Ors. v. Shrinath Chaturvedi [(2002) 6 SCC 635] would prevail as the judgment delivered in this case holds the field. .Supre" President taken the memo. But also told advocate filed vakalath already. vakalath he was filing on 90th day. but did not file any reply. In the memo I mentioned it is wrong in law to accept vakalath form on 90th day and should have passed exparte orders. President told 3,4,5,6 are exparte. 1 and 2 file objections. Now should I file execution petition for exparte orders issued against OP 3,4,5,6? Meanwhile yesterday same advocate filed vakalath form on behalf of OP 3,4,5,6. and also filed a applicaotin asking to set aside exparte orders of OP 3.4.5.6. in his set aside applicatoin OP lawyer says, OP 3,4,5,6 were gone on leave, all notice was in cupboard and now they came to know about notice. How to tackle this? Should I give execution applicaiton for exparte orders passed for OP 3,4,5,6? or file objections to application given for setting aside exparte orders agaisnt OP 3,4,5,6?

I have asked under RTI act how can president overrule CP act sectoin 13 rules? I have asked how can president of consumer fora sideline Hon SC guidelines in A three member bench of Supreme Court comprising Justice Anil R Dave , Justices Vikramjit Sen and P C Ghose , while disposing the civil appeal nos.10941-10942 OF 2013 under Consumer Protection Act,1 986 of New India Assurance Co . Ltd versus Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage Pvt Ltd held that the District Forum can grant a further period of 15 days to the opposite party for filing his version or reply and not beyond that .

Plus exparte orders copy forum has not given to me. Before court gave it, OP lawyer filed set aside application. What to do? Shall I file execution petition?

Consumer Complainant   20 June 2018 at 23:34

Help

Sir and madam, My fan wiring burst and that is why I filed case in consumer fora. My case out of 6 parties, one is fan company owner by name crompton greaves. Another 5 parties are, 1 seller who sold the fan. parties 3, 4 , 5, 6 are KPTCL officers and workers. KPTCL is Karnataka Power transmissoin corporation limted. Part 1 and 2 appeared but did not file any reply for 90 days. On 90th day one advocate appeared and told he will file vakalath and objections. I gave a memo stating that as per NCRDC guidlines and supreme court guidelines only 45 days maximum time limit for opposite party to file reply from date of issue of notice. Here is HON SC guidelines "The Supreme Court held that the District Forum can grant a further period of 15 days in addition to the 30 days (from the date of notice) provided for in section 13 of the Act to the opposite party for filing his version or reply and not beyond that. It was held that the view expressed by the three Judge Bench of this Court in Dr. J.J. Merchant & Ors. v. Shrinath Chaturvedi [(2002) 6 SCC 635] would prevail as the judgment delivered in this case holds the field. .Supre" President taken the memo. But also told advocate filed vakalath already. vakalath he was filing on 90th day. but did not file any reply. In the memo I mentioned it is wrong in law to accept vakalath form on 90th day and should have passed exparte orders. President told 3,4,5,6 are exparte. 1 and 2 file objections. Now should I file execution petition for exparte orders issued against OP 3,4,5,6? Meanwhile yesterday same advocate filed vakalath form on behalf of OP 3,4,5,6. and also filed a applicaotin asking to set aside exparte orders of OP 3.4.5.6. in his set aside applicatoin OP lawyer says, OP 3,4,5,6 were gone on leave, all notice was in cupboard and now they came to know about notice. How to tackle this? Should I give execution applicaiton for exparte orders passed for OP 3,4,5,6? or file objections to application given for setting aside exparte orders agaisnt OP 3,4,5,6?

I have asked under RTI act how can president overrule CP act sectoin 13 rules? I have asked how can president of consumer fora sideline Hon SC guidelines in A three member bench of Supreme Court comprising Justice Anil R Dave , Justices Vikramjit Sen and P C Ghose , while disposing the civil appeal nos.10941-10942 OF 2013 under Consumer Protection Act,1 986 of New India Assurance Co . Ltd versus Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage Pvt Ltd held that the District Forum can grant a further period of 15 days to the opposite party for filing his version or reply and not beyond that .

Plus exparte orders copy forum has not given to me. Before court gave it, OP lawyer filed set aside application. What to do? Shall I file execution petition?

Kumar......   20 June 2018 at 22:49

Co owned house

i and my wife own a house. i am not working due to health reasons, my wife is paying the EMI. now we are planning to sell the house. can i get an idea how much money i will be getting from the sale of house ?

s p verma   20 June 2018 at 21:02

Departmental enquiry

Sir
can a departmental enquiry be reopen if the Disciplinary authority has quashed the enquiry report and exonerate the charged officer from the charges levelled against him

Pramod Kumar   20 June 2018 at 20:12

Payment of Gratuity act 1972

I had worked in one of the reputed public sector bank for 4 years and 298 days being my joining date as 29.04.2013 and resignation on 20.02.2018. my employer denied me that I am not eligible for gratuity as the rule of 5 years continuous service is not completed. Please guide me whether I am eligible for gratuity or not.

Pradeep Agarwal   20 June 2018 at 17:15

Filing 138 after nclt

A lender of my client has attempted a fraud on them. They had received a security cheque against a loan in 2014 but did not return it saying they had lost it. Maintaining good relations and rapport with my client they, took replacement cheques thereafter. In 2015 my client had closed the account towards this specific cheques. We did not inform the lender as we believed they were honorable and had genuinely lost the same. In 2017 the company from which the cheque was issued went into NCLT. Fearing loss of the loan, the lender found these cheques, entered a date just before the date of NCLT and deposited the cheques in Feb 2018.
The cheques were naturally returned and they claimed through trusted mediators that this is only to safeguard legal side and they will not proceed further.
My client doubts lenders integrity now and wants to know recourse.
I understand that 138 can be filed even if NCLT is on but in all cases I find that the act of the bounce is before the NCLT proceeding. In this case, although fraud in larger picture, the instant action is deposit and bounce AFTER NCLT. Can 138 stand? If not, is there a precedent to this situation? I recall a power company having a similar case with a rental company but cant find the ruling. Please help.