To know effectiveness of bill no 151 of 2015
Madhu Mittal
(Querist) 29 May 2015
This query is : Resolved
To know effectiveness of bill no 151 of 2015
Respected Sirs,
I am enclosing copy of bill no. 151 of 2015 published in the Gazette of India dated 06.05.2015
Please let me know whether it is already effective from 06.05.2015 or yet to be effective from any other later date.
I could not attach the file here so I have attached it at http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/To-know-effectiveness-of-bill-no-151-of-2015-121698.asp#.VWgwJNKqqko
Guest
(Expert) 29 May 2015
The bill is never made effective unless passed as Act by adopting due process. So, you will have to wait for another Gazette of India which will contain the Amenment Act after the bill is passed by both the houses and assented by the President of India.
However, the courts are free to decide the existing cases based on the Supreme Court judgment dated 1st August, 2014, in the case of Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod versus State of Maharashtra and another (Criminal Appeal No. 2287 of 2009)
Madhu Mittal
(Querist) 30 May 2015
Thanks with regard for answering my query.
Guest
(Expert) 30 May 2015
You are welcome.
Madhu Mittal
(Querist) 17 June 2015
Respected Sirs,
Please find attached the Negotiable Instruments (amendment) Ordinance 2015 No. 6 of 2015 dated 15.06.2015. In which, It was stated under 1(2) It shall come into force at once.
Please confirm whether now onwards, jursidication can be taken on the basis of this Ordinance"
file is attached at http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/details.asp?mod_id=121698&offset=1#.VYE2FPmqqko
Guest
(Expert) 17 June 2015
You can, as the ordinance is effective from 15.06.2015. There seems no hurdle in passing of the related bill by the Parliament.
Madhu Mittal
(Querist) 17 June 2015
Respected sir,
Thank you for clear and so early response.
Guest
(Expert) 17 June 2015
You are welcome.
Madhu Mittal
(Querist) 12 September 2015
Respected Sirs,
At thread http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Negotiable-instrument-ordinance-126555.asp#.VfPT8tKqqkp it is said now ordinance has lapsed. Please let me know now whether jurisdiction will be taken as1. ordinance or as 2. in the case of Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod versus State of Maharashtra and another (Criminal Appeal No. 2287 of 2009) or 3. As earliar k.Bhaskarar. As per me it should be as per 2. in the case of Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod. I am giving you this trouble I want to get it confirmed from learned members before case presenting in the court.
Thanks with Regards,
