Employment agreement cum bond
Tejendra
(Querist) 19 January 2017
This query is : Resolved
Employment agreemed or Employment Bond is valid?
I am not asking for labour it is for other than labour
Guest
(Expert) 19 January 2017
If not asking for labour, please clarify with reference to which spedcific aspect you want to know validity of employment agreement or employment bond?
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 19 January 2017
The intended bond/agreement 'Employment agreemed or Employment Bond' is as the title suggests for employee.
Do you mean that the falling outside the purview of def. of 'Workman' as in ID Act?
Tejendra
(Querist) 19 January 2017
Yes I mean tha exactly.
Tejendra
(Querist) 19 January 2017
ok ok ok ok
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 19 January 2017
Academic query.
State material facts of the problem if any.
How are you concerned / related with the query?
Guest
(Expert) 19 January 2017
Rajendra ji,
When Mr. Kumar Doab wants to proceed on hit and trial method in the absence of any background, what to state of material facts, why the author should take trouble to state material facts?
On one hand the author says, "I am not asking for labour it is for other than labour", but on the other he has repeated the spoon fed reply of Mr. Doab, confirming again with OK (four times), as if labour is not an employee and he is considered outside the employment.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 19 January 2017
Dhingra,
You will not comment on any post and any comment posted by me.
You have been instructed many times on it.
Expert Mr. Rajendra K Goyal, author, and anyone else is not your route to comment on me and my post.
You will not frame any kind of guidelines or rule for anyone to post anything.
You have nothing else to do then keep quite and remain in your private fiefdom.
Store the instructions permanently in your head.
Guest
(Expert) 19 January 2017
Mr. Doab,
If you are a expert, don't you know that your order/ instruction for me has no legal validity. What type of expert you are when you do not know even basics of law?
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 19 January 2017
Dhingra,
It is only your adamant and recalcitrant mind and chronic habit of abuse that is failing you to understand that my instructions to you are valid and cost and consequences of your abuse is heritable.
Your being expert (title) at LCI is of NO relief to you.
Now shut up and go away permanently.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 19 January 2017
Dhingra is once again glued to his computer.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 19 January 2017
Dear Expert Mr. Rajendra K Goyal,
I am sure that you have not allowed Dhingra to route his trademark abuse and nuisance thru you.
Many experts have communicated with each other since many years about despicable conduct of Dhingra.
Guest
(Expert) 19 January 2017
Mr. Kumar Doab,
It is your habit to openly hurl abuses on me, while due to your strange behaviour you allege me to abuse.
When I did not address my post to you, with what legal right you could order me not to comment or to express my opinion on any vague post, may be yours?
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 19 January 2017
Dhingra,
In your trademark style you are hellbent on enacting another Tamasha (in your own fond words) in this thread also.
My rights do not come from your hallucinations or end with your hallucinations.
It is not me alone but many querists/authors/members/experts that made a grave error of ignoring, avoiding and thus tolerating your abuse, nuisance and despicable conduct...................thus emboldening you.
Many experts have communicated with each other since many years about your despicable conduct.
You are getting a befitting response.
Now shut up and go away permanently and don't come back.
Guest
(Expert) 19 January 2017
Mr. Kumar Doab,
You have addressed Shri Rajendra K Goyal, as follows:
"I am sure that you have not allowed Dhingra to route his trademark abuse and nuisance thru you."
What type of expert you are when you don't know that I don't need permission to address my opinion to him? Further, what is the substance in my post addressed to him, which you treat as trademark abuse and nuisance and under which law you treat that so?
You have further informed Mr. Rajendra K Goyal that "Many experts have communicated with each other since many years about despicable conduct of Dhingra."
Not only that, you have repeated in the next post as addressed to me, like, "Many experts have communicated with each other since many years about your despicable conduct."
You are requested to please post the extracts of their communications in this very thread for my information. If you fail to post the extracts of such communications, you can squarely be held guilty of criminal conspiracy against me by spreading false rumours and propaganda against me through the open forum. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE OF THAT.
Guest
(Expert) 19 January 2017
No Confirmations Or Denial with Justifications also Could be Treated as acceptance of Genuine Facts.PMs to be Referred.
Guest
(Expert) 20 January 2017
@Shri NJS Rajkumar,
Thanks for your statement, "No Confirmations Or Denial with Justifications also Could be Treated as acceptance of Genuine Facts.PMs to be Referred," seems to be unwarranted on your part. You may better make the clouds clear, if you have any such communication, as pointed out by Mr. Kumar Doab by searching your PM box.
I am sure, as a legal expert, you very well know that the burden of proof of his statement lies only on Mr. Kumar Doab.
So, if you also happened to be one of those many tipped of experts, who have communicated with each other since many years about my despicable conduct, you are welcome to help Mr. Kumar Doab providing extract of any such communication, if available in your PM.
Other experts, please don't mind, as tipped of by Mr. Doab, if happening to be part of such block of experts communicating secretively about me are also welcome to provide such extracts of communication to help him.
The experts, as tipped of by Mr. Kumar Doab, may like to make the things clear once for all, as at several occasions Mr. Kumar Doab has made such statements in the name of many experts.
Of course, there is no doubt that some of his favourites have been enjoying pouring of venom against me by Mr. Kumar Doab and did not even object when he did not desist from shamelessly including daughters and sisters in his postings.
Guest
(Expert) 20 January 2017
I had mentioned about the Person who Intentionally Provokes the Senior Experts/Senior Advocates.Our Excellent Senior Expert Senior Advocate Mr.Rajkumar Makkad Left this Thread Because of him and Because of His Comments Only.Refer the Last Post of Senior Mr.Rajkumar Makkad Ji.
Guest
(Expert) 20 January 2017
Dear NJS Rajkumar,
Please be clear instead of making puzzles.
Guest
(Expert) 20 January 2017
Refer the Last Post Posted by Senior Expert/Senior Advocate Mr.Rajkumar Makkad Ji.
Guest
(Expert) 20 January 2017
Dear NJS Rajkumar,
You could have given link of his post. Otherwise, the last and latest post in the Experts section of Shri Raj Kumar Makkad pertains two moths back and is available at the following link. On that link, I could not find any such intention of Shri Rajkumar Makkad, as you have stated:
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Is-it-necessary-to-Get-Probate-of-a-Will-In-Rajasthan--58796.asp
Guest
(Expert) 20 January 2017
"Desiring Querist Could raise Query thro my Personal Message" Posted by the Senior Expert it self.Refer that thread and you could recognise whom had been mentioned about.
Guest
(Expert) 20 January 2017
Again a riddle!!!!!!!
