This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 28.10.2009 pertaining to assessment year 2005-06. The grounds raised read as under:- “(i) In the facts and the circumstances of the ..
The assessee is converting scrap iron into MS steel. In the previous year relevant to the impugned assessment year, the assessee proceeded further to improve the value addition by converting MS steel again into TMT steel. In that process, the assesse..
At the time of hearing, it was brought to our notice that this appeal emanates from a revisional order passed u/s 263 of the Act and because the revisionary proceeding itself has been struck down by the Tribunal vide its order dated 17.12.009, this a..
Brief facts of this issue are that while doing the scrutiny assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the disallowance by observing as under:- “On examination of the books of accounts it is observed that no tax on such payment/credit has be..
The assessment in this case was completed under section 143(3). Later, on verification of the records of the case, the Commissioner of Income Tax found that that the assessing authority has not examined the genuineness of certain trade creditors whic..
We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the facts and circumstances of the case. The brief facts are that the assessee is a charitable Institution registered under section 12AA of the Act by DIT(Exemption), Kolkata vide order dated 30.06..
In the grounds of appeal, the assessee has taken one legal plea that while rejecting the assessee’s application for renewal of exemption u/s 80G filed on 24.12.2011, the learned DIT(E) has ignored the amendment made in Section 80G(5)(vi) by the Finan..
Facts of the case in brief are that the A.O. noted that the assessee has received Sales Tax incentive of Rs. 12,94,109/- in respect of Unit I and Sales Tax incentive of Rs. 84687/- in respect of Unit II on which deduction u/s 80IB has been claimed. A..
The grounds of appeal raised by assessee read as under :- “1. For that the order of assessment as well as order of appeal is bad in law and should quashed. 2. For that the written submission filed in appeal was not considered. 3. For that the re..
That, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. C.I.T.(A) has erred in law in accepting fresh evidences filed by the assessee without calling for remand report from the AO, which is in contravention of the provision of Rule 46.” Same common..
ITA No. 3871/Mum/2008 filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 8.2.2008 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (A)- XXII, Mumbai relating to Assessment Year 2004-05. ITA No. 87/Mum/2010 filed by the assessee is directed against the order ..
In appeal for the assessment year 2001-02, the Revenue assails deletion of additions of Rs.3,60,000/- and Rs.1,56,388/- made by the ld. CIT(A). During the course of hearing, it was admitted by the ld. DR that the tax effect in this case was less than..
Facts of the case in brief are that the A.O. during the course of assessment proceedings noted that the assessee has earned exempt dividend income of Rs. 4,63,50,000/- on investments made. He noted that the assessee has borrowed interest bearing fun..
This appeal by assessee is arising out of order of CIT(A), Durgapur in Appeal No.75 / CIT(A)/DGP/2009-10 dated 28.02.2011. Assessment was framed by ITO, Ward-1(3), Durgapur u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”..
The facts are that the assessee filed his return on 30.07.2007 declaring total income of Rs. 3,81,368/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) at the returned income. Thereafter, the case was taken up for scrutiny. The assessee has derived salary incom..
The appeal was filed on 08.12.2010 when an acknowledgement cum- notice was served on the bearer under which the appeal was fixed for hearing on 10.02.2011. None attended on that date. Thereafter, another notice dated 07.10.2011 was served on the asse..
Brief facts of this issue are that during the year, the company has written off unsecured loans to the tune of Rs.52.75 lakhs and it is mentioned in the schedule-L i.e., notes forming part of accounts that there was no claim from the loan creditors a..
The above appeal is filed by assessee against the order dated 01.06.2009 of the ld. CIT-XII (Admn.), Kolkata pertaining to A.yr. 2005-06. This appeal is against order u/s 263 of the IT Act wherein the ld.CIT(Admn) has directed the AO to make disa..
The present appeal is filed by the revenue against the ld. CIT(A)’s order dated 22.11.2010 passed in the matter of an assessment made by the Assessing Officer u/s 115WE(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the A.Y. 2006-07. The only ground raised by th..
I have heard Ld. DR Shri R. Gupta and gone through facts and circumstances of the case. I find that the assessee has purchased fixed deposit from ITC Classic Finance Ltd. On 27.06.1995 vide receipt no. 02/199506/53666C/53667C/53702C at Rs.12,600/- (i..
Member Strength 9,48,960 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
