When these facts were brought to the notice of the ld. counsel for the assessee, he fairly submitted that the second appeal could not have been filed against the same order when the first appeal had already been dismissed by the ld. CIT(Appeals). On ..
At the time of hearing, the learned AR submitted that the assessee company has not received assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 r/w section 143(3) for the assessment year 2002-03 as stated by the Assessing Officer that the order ..
Having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules, 1963 and following various decisions of the Tribunal including in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd., reported in 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and the judgment of Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case..
The issue in appeal lies in a very narrow compass of material facts. The assessee is engaged in the business of rendering stevedoring and CFS (container freight station) services. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer not..
Despite sending defect memo and notice of hearing sufficiently in advance, assessee did not respond either to defect memo or notice of hearing. So, it is inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecution of this appeal..
The brief facts necessitating the present revision petition are that acting on intelligence that large quantity of ball bearing were being smuggled from Nepal into Delhi, the DRI kept surveillance in and around Delhi. On 04.08.1992, the DRI intercept..
Facts: Following international competitive bidding procedures, the Appellant had invited bids for the supply and installation of Steam Generator package for captive coal- based Thermal Power Projects in different areas. The bid of the Respondent No..
These appeals under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short “the Act”) are directed against a common final order, dated 2nd February 2005 in Appeal No. E/5261-62/04-NB(A), passed by the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribuna..
The assessee company is engaged in the business of real estate. During this year it purchased some land in district Alwar (Rajasthan) through Shri Jagdish Beniwal, who used to coordinate in purchases between the assessee company and the sellers of th..
On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition on account of Rs.23,00,894/- on account of short recoveries, despite the fact that the transacting parties continued to do business regularly. CIT(A) di..
The assessee claimed to be engaged in the business of agricultural activities in the name of Samak Farms & Nursery and held agricultural fields at various places in the districts of Ghaziabad and Gurgaon. In the return of income, assessee claimed agr..
That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (A) has erred in upholding the disallowance of interest and deemed expenses under section 14A of the Income-tax Act read with Rule 8D. That on the fact..
At the time of hearing of the appeal on 30.01.2012, the Counsel for Shri P.K. Sharma, managing director of the assessee company was specifically asked to show the competence of managing director to file the present appeal when assessee company is alr..
These are appeals by way of special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution against the judgment and orders of the Bombay High Court holding that the entire amount received by an assessee on sale of the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (for short ‘the ..
After considering the rival submissions we find that additions on which penalty has been levied u/s.271(1)© have been restored to the file of the AO by the Tribunal in I.T.A.No.6065/Mum/07 [copy of order filed on record]. Therefore, we are of the vie..
Facts in brief are that the AO during the assessment proceedings noticed that the assessee had earned dividend income of Rs.14,16,221/- which was exempt from tax but the assessee had not disallowed any expenses relating to said income. He, therefore,..
The ld. Assessing Officer has resorted to Rule 8D while calculating the disallowance u/s 14A in respect of exempted dividend income of Rs. 1,27,16,222/- at a sum of Rs. 16,02,548/-. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the CIT (A) where it..
It needs to be noted here that a legal entity — a natural person or an artificial person — can sue or be sued in his/its own name in a court of law or a tribunal. It is not merely a procedural there are special provisions in the Constitution and the..
The petitioner made several prayers, but, as of now, this petition is limited to the quashing of the ACR in respect of the petitioner for the year 2008, whereby the petitioner was graded as ‘B’. This would be evident from the order dated 06.07.2010 p..
The assessee is an oil exploration company and is engaged in extraction and sale of crude oil from PY-3 Block in the Cauveri Offshore area. The assessee claimed that it was an industrial undertaking eligible for 100% deduction of its profits derived ..
Member Strength 9,49,196 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
