Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

State Legal Service Authority

N.K.Assumi ,
  24 July 2010       Share Bookmark

Court :
Supreme Court
Brief :
State Legal Service Authority
Citation :
Supreme Court Bar Association v. union of India

State Legal Service Authority

 

In Supreme Court Bar Association v. union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 27 of 2007, the Supreme Court categorically ruled that u/s 6(2) of Legal Services Authority Act, sitting judges of the High Courts, should be appointed Executive Chairman of State Legal Services Authority. The court observations are worth nothing:

“Though in terms of section 6(2) retired judge can be appointed, but that shall have to be in exceptional circumstances. The advantage of having a sitting judge as the Chairman far outweight the disadvantages, some of which have been highlighted by learned counsel for the States where retired Judges are appointed. Therefore, normal rule is that a sitting Judge should be appointed as the Chairman and only when unusual difficulties exist, a retired Judge may be appointed. That has to be the exception and not the rule.”

(Decided on March 13, 2007)

 
"Loved reading this piece by N.K.Assumi?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"



Published in Civil Law
Views : 1033




Comments





Latest Judgments


More »