Ex parte decree can not be passed behind the back of the party, as it wil amount to gross injustice to the aggrieved party in the case. Yes, court can passed Ex parte decree provided there is clear and cogent evidence that one of the party deliberately and intentionally avoided to receive notice of the court.
When we studying we married in 2014 but live separate....in 2017 we submit joint petition for divorce...and write in petition we live together only one day....before petition my wife submit aa FIR and write in FIR that we are not married....and more allegation to me say that he use drug therefore i am not ready for marriage but she is already married.. i have medical reports that show i am not use any drug..and when consoling police say that this marriage is not valid ...i have Gurudwara marriage certificate...and police force me for divorce....and my parents and me invite my wife for live together but my wife not come....now i want save marriage what i do ...in petition i write we live together only one day....plz help me
Have you replied to the notice, which is a priority ?
If not contact your advocate and respond suitably, informing them of Police complaint filed.
Have you informed the tracing of the cheques to the Police.
If not contact the police with your advocate and the copy of notice issued and ask them to initiate investigation.
No purpose can be served just by posting some queries, and not implementing even a word given as guidance. Take some steps after careful consideration and consulting advocate.
In all probability, the culprit may not be dare to file such a suit, but be prepared to face any thing by taking all precautions.
Cooperate with her patiently and ensure she melts one day and willingly satisfies you. We are civilized people . We can't have s*x like we get from prostitutes. Nothing in family relationships is duty or right. We shouldn't force family members to feel for us. They should "naturally" feel for us and "feel like doing things that please us".
Change your mindset please.
We pay money to prostitute so we get right, it becomes "duty" or "work" for them to oblige whether by nature she is willing to participate in s*x or not. Wife on the other hand is neither a prostitute nor s*x is matter of "right" for you nor "duty" or "work" for her. If she does not feel like pleasing you know reasons patiently win her love.
If partner does not participate in s*x willingly in marital relationship that s*x is as good as having s*x with prostitute.
These two guys are not returning my gold back their names are Krishna and Surojit
F.I.R Lodged against them
I have given them gold for the first time in the month of october to make a necklace and they returned the gold in the form of necklace but the second time when the gold was given again in the month of November 2016 they have not returned
On the 6 November I gave gold amounting to 50000 to them to make a necklace they promised me they will return the gold in the form of necklace on the 16 November, the delivery date of this necklace to the customer was the 24 November, from the 16 November 2016 to the 4 December 2016 I made so many calls and on every call he made a new promise to return my gold, visited their place business place and left messages with their workers, but all this went in vain. NC was filed on 5 december 2016
From 5 december 2016 to 29 April 2017 I made calls but they did not return my gold.
F.I.R lodged on the 29 April
I want to know whether IPC section 420 is applicable or not??
Sir / Madam
The Principal district and session Judge made an Order on the basis of the Advocate's statement and put a remark that "the Magistrate breached his Order"
The Principal Judge has not checked record from his Office and only relying on the advocate's statement he passed such Order
under RTI Act, I succeded in obtaining the information from the Office of the Principal JUdge that record of his office shows that Magistrate has not acted in contrary to his Order
I filed application u/s. 340 of Cr P C against the Advocate and brought the facts of the case before The Principal Judge and in open Court while arguing, in excitement, I have pointed out that he (Principal Judge) did not check his own records and fixed black dot on the Magistrate
Thereafter the Other Magistrate have dismissed my two application for want of prosecution because I was not present in Court when called in Morning Session
Now the situation is
Either advocate is wrong
Or Magistrate is wrong
Or Principal Judge is wrong
Because I have pointed out serious mistake of Principal Judge and hence I fear my all cases may have similar fate on one or other grouds
Whether this is enough ground to file an application u/s. 407 of Cr P C. to transfer my all pendingf cases from that District to any Other Districy in the State
If yes then,
Kindly also give me formate thereof and tell how to get interim stay therein ?
Thanks for your guidance
After reading all Replies I understand as under :-
(1) I must file Reply to Divorce Petition
(2) I must file "Misc. Application in Original Divorce Petition"
and in the above Misc. Application
I can file I. A. (Internal Application) praying for interim and ad-interim Maintenance
Kindly guide and if possible attach herewith Draft of HMA 24 application
Thank you for your response, Kumar
I will check out with the labour union about this and see the best course of action to solve this amicably.
Our performance apprasiasal and eligible amount of ESOP was communicated to us verbally in December 2016 with the promise that we would get it on paper in 2017 by March. Unfortunately, no written communication ESOPs we were eligible was made to us. My other 8 colleagues also were asked to sign similar relieving letters or get nothing. I left in Apr 2017.
The change of designation and pay in response to my resignation was on mail. Remaining was told verbally during the discussion I had with him in the evening.
When I objected to the decision, I was asked to leave immediately and the CEO followed me to my desk, and out of office. My colleagues were around and saw what happened.
The relieving letter with the clause of owing nothing is written and there. The fact it is that or nothing was told verbally. The only eveidence is company official about us page, showed me in same designation ( Head of marcom) till last working day. There was no official rating / notice for changing my designation.
The mangement's objective of the excercise was to instil fear of exit procedure and prevent remaining employees from leaving the company though there is no bond in official offer letter.
Go for divorce in Mumbai, its anytime better.
Kapil Chandna Advocate