SC Benches

Dear Sirs,

Dons and Police are in Control of Political and Politics is in control of Judis.........That why my advice was like that...........Police can put a case or settle acase but a Judis has full power to admit it or dismiss it.....Police has no such power...

It was about unofficial or u may say out of court settlement Mr. girishankarji, which some policewala do.

Dera sir Police wala Corruptionis a ratail one but Judis Corrution is whole sale....What is the relief

Against many Police officials action was taken openly example Rathore Case but is there any action taken so far in one corrupted Judis....Pl let me know....

why? against a few judges also some reports are there. one previous member satyapraksh submited an article. you must read it. i am having a newspaper cutting that one judge was dismissed from his servicess.

What action against Rathore? It is an eye wash.

Mr Gupta Ji,

What hppnd to the Judgements Given by that few Judges who got dismissed ? pl let me Know

Gupta Ji,

Is it a eye wash Just as Rathore Case ?

noted

it is true.

Yes it is remarkable thing that "what happened to judgement delivered by the tainted judges". What provision for this is there?

"what happened to judgement delivered by the tainted judges". - very good question.

How sacrosanct is setting up of SC benches outside Delhi. Please read what happened in Jammu & Kashmir:

The Board of Judicial Advisers at the time of its abolition by the Constitution Act 1956 had 17 appeals pending before it. On request of the Chief Justice, the Government of India in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, constituted a Special Bench of the Supreme Court of India consisting of Justice Mehar Chand Mahajan, chief Justice of India, Justice S.R.Das and Justice Ghulam Hassan for disposing off the pending 17 appeals. The Bench heard the appeals in Srinagar and upheld the judgement of the High court in all the 17 appeals. It was a historical event, when a Bench of Supreme Court held sitting outside the place of seat at Delhi till date this is the sole instance. On 10.9.1943, Letters Patent was conferred on the High Court.

Now we are raising hell over the matter.

[IHRO] In India, the privileged ones are unconcerned abt majority, subsisting @Rs 20 daily

CJI defends decision to seek DA for wife

16 January 2010

New Delhi, 16 JAN: Chief Justice of India Mr KG Balakrishnan (in photo) today defended his decision to seek dearness allowance for wife when the couple recently went on a foreign tour saying it was being provided for the last several years.
“Continously to my knowledge since several years, the dearness allowance was paid because somebody who goes abroad should eat something. That is why....otherwise, in a foreign country one cannot survive without eating. Sometime, it is (DA) permissible under our rules,” he told CNN-IBN.
He was asked about the recent controversy relating to the Supreme Court Secretary General's writing a letter to the government seeking DA benefits for his wife.
The Supreme Court registry had yesterday  come out with a statement defending the Chief Justice, a day after the government, in response to an RTI application, said there was provision only for air-ticket to the spouse of CJI and other judges of the Supreme Court and no other allowance has been sanctioned by the Department of Justice.
The Chief Justice denied inference that he was personally opposed to the disclosure of assets by judges and cautioned that the information being sought under the RTI could at times seriously affect the image of the judiciary. “At no point of time I was against disclosure of assets. Sometimes, some people will say that gives some unfavourable report against Chief Justice. Sometimes good report about him.
Referring to the row relating to Justice Mr PD Dinakaran of Karnataka High Court, the CJI was of the view that the “vilification” campaign was started against him only after his name was recommended for elevation to the Supreme Court. Pti