Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Kumar Doab (FIN)     17 May 2012

A writ petition upside down

The HC has set condition of servicing the notice to you. Did you receive any notice? You should have appeared.

There is an unwarranted intruption.

With the grace of god you shall succeed.Approach your lawyer.



Learning

 12 Replies

Kumar Doab (FIN)     17 May 2012

The HC has set condition of servicing the notice to you. Did you receive any notice? You should have appeared.

There is an unwarranted intruption.

With the grace of god you shall succeed.Approach your lawyer.

Dr. MPS RAMANI Ph.D.[Tech.] (Scientist/Engineer)     03 July 2012

How can a stay order or for that metter any order of a court be kept secret?  If you had yourself kept in touch with the developments, you would have come to know immediately.

Kumar Doab (FIN)     21 July 2012

Good move.

One properly informed employee is sufficient in the life time of high headed, adamant, and repressive, recalcitrant, offender management and employer.

Let them once again stand in the corridors and sit on the bench of court of law. Let their names be called to appear before court of law and let them in box ( Katghara) and let them go back to office and home and tell each one what happened to them.

They shall tell everyone or they shall hide? Different people have different character.

However those who are around watch and understand.

It is felt that you have resolve, perseverance, evidence to win the case and to prove the malafide at later stage.

Kumar Doab (FIN)     11 August 2012

The company has probably foreseen the expected outcome of the dispute being heard in CGIT and is afraid that based on merits the decision shall be in your favor and hence the writ. Can your services be transferred to Ahmedabad as per transfer mobility policy of the company? It is felt that as per your posts it can not be. Company is burdening you with litigation. However you should put in your best defense and should succeed in convincing the HC that proceedings at CGIT are not quashed and in getting a decision to let the proceeding at CGIT conclude .

revribhav (Hindi)     18 April 2013

Text of relevant application for stay order in respect of c.w.s.b. 4007/2012 and stay order is attached herewith

Attached File : 956387968 set stay order 4007.pdf downloaded: 73 times

revribhav (Hindi)     01 May 2013

efiling.sci <efiling.sci@nic.in> Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:39 PM
To: Revribhav <revribhav@gmail.com>

Re-Filing of documents done by you in D.No. 41357 of 2012 on 23.03.2013 have been sent to the concerned Section X for further necessary action.

revribhav (Hindi)     03 May 2013

https://rhccasestatus.raj.nic.in/smsrhcb/rhbcis/index.asp

PENDING

Date of query : 3/5/2013 Time : 7:54:36 AM
CW'4007' of 2012 - R 7659/2012
Petitioner : NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO ANR
Respondent: U O I (MINISTRY OF LABOUR )ORS
Petitioner Advocate: VIRENDRA SINGH YADAV
Respondent Advocate: SHASHANK SHARMA
Class Code : 1502 Registered on : 22/3/2012
Bench : SB Stage : FOR ADMISSION- NOTICE SERVED
DATE GIVEN BY: PESHI CLERK DATE
Peshi Date : 6/5/2013
Listing in court No. 8 on 30/07/2012


Department Details
Dept Type Dept Code Dept Name
S 46 Labour

Paper Details
No. Type Date of filing
45469/2012 AFFIDAVIT 29/9/2012
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO ANR VS U O I (MINISTRY OF LABOUR )ORS VIRENDRA SINGH YADAV Court Fee :
Proc. Fee :

27993/2012 APPLICATION 5/7/2012
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO ANR VS U O I (MINISTRY OF LABOUR )ORS SHRI GOPAL Court Fee : 2
Proc. Fee :

26528/2012 POWER 31/5/2012
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO ANR VS U O I (MINISTRY OF LABOUR )ORS SHASHANK SHARMA Court Fee :
Proc. Fee :

16238/2012 PF+NOTICE+EXTRA 10/4/2012
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO ANR VS U O I (MINISTRY OF LABOUR )ORS VIRENDRA SINGH YADAV Court Fee : 10
Proc. Fee :



 

revribhav (Hindi)     22 July 2013

rev ribhav <revribhav@yahoo.com> Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:21 AM
To: "arsekar@newindia.co.in" <arsekar@newindia.co.in>, "gsrinivasan@newindia.co.in" <gsrinivasan@newindia.co.in>, "kv.krishna@newindia.co.in" <kv.krishna@newindia.co.in>

21.07.13 chief justice rep 41357.pdf
719K View as HTML Scan and download



Revribhav <revribhav@gmail.com> Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:15 AM
To: ru-ol@mha.nic.in, dirimp_ol@nic.in, techcell-ol@nic.in
Cc: ENDcorruption <ENDcorruption@5thpillar.org>, "tiindia.newdelhi" <tiindia.newdelhi@gmail.com>, amnestyindiaorg <amnestyindiaorg@gmail.com>
Bcc: vigilance <vigilance@nic.in>, "ml.chulet" <ml.chulet@newindia.co.in>, "kamlesh.vashist" <kamlesh.vashist@nic.co.in>

For information and necessary action please:
Department of Official Language (Ministry of Home Affairs)
New Delhi-110003.



The photo of a well known bribe taker with insurance company chairman
as on 20 July 2012 has been attached in the writ petition.
I attach herewith the speaking declaration of his appointing
authority,Mrs. Kamlesh vashisht that she was unable to remove
him,despite corrupt act,because of head office.
complainant:
Shri Gopal Soni
C231
Panchsheel Nagar,
Ajmer-305004

Request for justice:pending writ petition Shri Gopal Soni,hindi translator,Ajmer
Revribhav Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:09 AM
To: efiling.sci@nic.in, supremecourt@nic.in
Cc: nsr.chandraprasad@nic.co.in, aksinghal55@gmail.com, secyol@nic.in
Bcc: amnestyindiaorg@gmail.com, tiindia.newdelhi@gmail.com, revribhav2@gmail.com, revribhav@yahoo.com, pspradeep3@gmail.com

Honble Mr. Justice P. Sathasivam, Chief Justice,
 The Supreme Courtof India,New Delhi-110001.
 
Re: Prolongedpendingwrit petition No. ……of 201 underArticle 32
 
Shri Gopal Soni                        ………….Petitioner- in -Person
 
Versus
 
New IndiaAssurance Co. Ltd. &Ors.           ……Respondent
 
DiaryNo. 41357/2012
 
Your lordship,
 
Withreferenceto theabovethehumblepetitioner submits that:
 
1.          That  petitioner,a class IIIemployeeof respondentinsurance company has beendeniedof his fundamental rightto earnalivelihoodwithdignitysincelong. The petitioneris a highly qualified experiencedtranslator , withtwo decades of experience was issued a transfer as a clerk,a lower qualification post that he legally resisted. In retaliation he suffered suspensionw.e.f. 10thApril 2008withoutany specific chargeandforcedto dismissalw.e.f. November 2009on citing a “grave“ violation of leaving headquarters. Thepetitioner has no means of supportsince 2008whenhis wages were reduced andsince 2009 without any consent of petitioner most of his provident fund,his gratuity,wage revisions arrears that were paid to recorded corrupt officials,etc. denied.
 
2.  That despite extremely limited resources one sonof  petitioner studies inIIT,hesecuredtheall indiarankof 133two years ago , another recently found place amongst 1500 toppers in IIT-JEE.          However facingfrivolous  chargesfrom employer’s mischievous domestic enquiry, its consequences and the shocking activism of respondent’s obstructing adjudication of industrial dispute   sucked away a poor workman’s fundamental rights.
 
 
3. Thatpresent  Writ Petition,the last straw in the sinking ship of a living, suffering human beingwas filed dated 13thDecember 2012. The registry   found a few defects,vide last  letter dated 30 May 2013 aremoval                        application dated 21 June2013 was soon responded by way of e-filing.
ThattheHonbleSupremeCourt has unlimited powers to dispensejusticeand itis not bound bystatute.    Lordship’s kindinterventionis desperately prayedto ignoretechnical or procedural defects,if any, inthe  enclosed Writ Petition&grant much awaited justice to a helpless victim.
 
 
ANDFOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS,THE PETITIONER AS IN DUTY BOUND SHALLEVER PRAY                           
Shri GopalSoni,                     (PETITIONER-IN-PERSON) Place: Ajmer                Dated 21July2013             encl. writ petition page 1-31



revribhav (Hindi)     22 July 2013

The attachment referred is attached herewith.


Attached File : 538883939 21.07.13 chief justice rep 41357.pdf downloaded: 70 times

revribhav (Hindi)     18 August 2013

A few defects of technical nature are keeping the writ petition still pending with the registry of SCI

(as on 16.08.2013)


Attached File : 938237174 defects sci diary no. 41357.pdf downloaded: 66 times

revribhav (Hindi)     20 May 2014

Recent notice received in May 2014  for removal of defects is attached


Attached File : 303778225 notice removal defect sci may 2014.pdf downloaded: 35 times

revribhav (Hindi)     20 June 2014

The writ petition has been updated as on 16.6.2014 and submitted by way of e-filing dated 20 July 2014


Attached File : 317424322 16.6.14 fresh writ 41357.pdf downloaded: 29 times

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register