Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Tajobsindia (Senior Partner )     14 January 2011

Daughters are not liabilities Ladyship.......

We were toying up for an opportunity to write about the topic when one learned Judge of Supreme court declared her daughters as LIABILITIES came up and share my thoughts about how incorrect it is to not fix the problem and just fix the blame.


It is quite imperative to treat a daughter as a human in the family. It is painful to know that a daughter is treated as a liability right from day one and a son treated as a guard and ATM sort of person and what irked me is that the wordings comes from the highest Court lone female Ladyship ! so I smell some more smoke from the ld. old guns in the days to come.


However, as readers may subscribe in LCI forum posts time and again I have written about Husbands and how husbnads are human too, but I have always felt the same for daughters (well today they are daughters but soon they will become wife's followed by proud mothers is it not!). Again there are combinations out here but I am conveying my message to those parents and brothers who go to any extent to dump their daughters in a marriage against her wishes. I have witnessed not one, but many distress calls where daughters have been dumped by their maiden family members into a marriage with a deadline as they want to get their daughter married who could make way for the wife of a brother. You may call me cynical but why me why not even the populist TV ads. of present of Tanisk and cars depicting the same psycic also to be balmed for this sentence ? How cruel!!! thus, causing a fractured marriage. Or the other cause is the peer pressure of 'samaj', which is good for nothing.


Such parents who treat the daughters as liability often believe in dumping their daughters in such a way that they are free from them and get accolades from the society “samaj” for getting them married. In such forced marriages divorce from the daughter’s side becomes inevitable, such females seldom fight a case as they want to get out rather than being obsessed for the money of her Mr.Wrong. Her Parents and Brothers even dump the divorced female who post divorce is then vulnerable and desperate to any 'chalta purja' (Tom, Dick and Harry) and then the loop of errors is endless in her life. In some cases the middle class victim daughter (divorcee) is on roads, well almost! unwilling to fight for money but seeking a parental compassion from the environment.


Ideally if we follow the trend of damage control like in 498a, then there should be severe laws to punish the parents of the daughters who force their daughters in to marriage. But here posps the billion Rupee question - “will such decent daughters who don’t punish their inlaws would punish their parents and siblings?” No they won’t. As they are not programmed that way. Her parents are also victims of the same 'samaj' peer pressure which is non existent.


Now, rather than fixing the blames its better to fix the problems. There has to be fundamental changes in the system. A fail safe plan for daughter from her parents’ side with exclusive rights of only her should be made compulsory by the government. Such should be the share of sons also, this will stop the attitude of parasitism and would rehabilitate the social structure which is fast changing to a state of confusion. As daughters are human too it is her parents who discriminate due to the social middle class structure.


NCRB data suggests that the number of daughters (below age group of 14) who commit suicide are slightly more than sons of the same age group. But the parents are not punished for their attitude that causes such deaths of daughters (like in case of daughter in law deaths). Further a married daughter would definitely seek redress from her parents; siblings during loneliness, once feeling unwanted from there, only then she would commit suicide. So in such cases even daughter’s parents’ legal role has to be defined.


The potential of Indian women is not identified correctly and hence treatment and relief’s given to her are breeding only dependency and her potential remains unleashed. Today the private nursing home for cancer, where my mom underwent surgery has a 100% lady staff including the doctor and are doing such a fantastic job. I simply get frustrated and think that why do most parents disown the daughter the day that she is born? On the other hand there are parents who would not stop interfering in marriage matters causing the damage. It should be an unconditional, constructive, fail safe support.


For siblings of the same family why put the sons in a better school and daughters in vernacular schools with lesser facilities? Do not pamper them but treat them as humans. Do not call them a liability and do not have an attitude of passing it on to another family by just dumping them in to a marriage with somebody who may be her forced choice.


Do not Divorce your daughters from her maiden family. Do not disown them. Do not dump them in to a forced marriage. Do not delete her from your house to make a way for a daughter in law, give her, her due share of love, attention and humanness rather then depriving her from equal treatment.


Once this is corrected such daughters would not be forced in to marriage and would be getting equal status in the society the relief would not breed parasitism and dependency (which is the case as of now) and create more and more 'Kiran Bedis, Kiran Shaws and Indra Nooyis', who would work in the same arena and win gracefully with no concessions.


Live for your daughter as well, not for society. 'Samaj' will only crib and add on to your woes but never solve the problem so dump and disown the undeserving sources that is the senseless samaj.


Do not push her out of your life, do not make her a forced daughter in law.


Accept your child at any age as your child, be it a son or daughter, don’t call her a liability and hence don’t treat her with your rejection.


Aab kya karey jaab 'samaj' ka pressure sey daar kar respected Ladyship bhi apani dono daughters ko 'liabaility' samajhti hai to apun to baas gyan baat saktey hai, ki daughters and sons dono baas barabar aaz, kal aur beta hua kaal sey.....................iss "samajik vichardhara" ko change karo hamari ladyship aur immediately edit karo apane profile statement SC Website sey.........baas request hi kar sakta hun baki aap Ladyship hai mei to aam adami hun apkey samney........aab contempt bhi laga dijiye jheel lenge lekin daughter and son dono barabar fir kahunga.

Credits:
Jinesh the jenny in a mega Kumbh of minds among us.............



Learning

 11 Replies


(Guest)

Things become opposite when sons and daughters get married.

Married daughters become more important than married sons.

Avnish Kaur (Consultant)     14 January 2011

HOW?

do their parents give them a share of their property?

same old mindset , like we send her a mithai tokra on diwali .............huh
 


(Guest)

property does not matter compared to parents love and affection...

when son marries mother becomes competetor of DIL...In most cases starts to hate son as he belongs to DIL...

(according to MIL)

Avnish Kaur (Consultant)     14 January 2011

why not property share as her brothers will get after her parents?

this is poor state of women in india inspite talks of women empowerment why no women organisation raised this issue?

if they become equal shareholders in propery like their brothers wojme in india will be self relian and on equal status as males.

Avnish Kaur (Consultant)     14 January 2011

why not property share as her brothers will get after her parents?

this is poor state of women in india inspite talks of women empowerment why no women organisation raised this issue?

if they become equal shareholders in propery like their brothers women in india will be self reliant and on equal status as males.


(Guest)

yes.but this is really a old fashioned mindset of indian women  that they don't claim their share in father's property. They love their brothers very much.....

Avnish Kaur (Consultant)     14 January 2011

if this mindset is changed , women empoerment will be there in a very small time and we will have equal status of women just like in developed countries.
 


(Guest)

yes....but it is happenning in urban areas....soon it will spread to rural areas...

a (cc)     15 January 2011

I fully agree with Avinash. Woman Organisations shud ask 4 change in mindset that parents shud give property to the daughters instead of dowry items/ornaments apart from educating them. This will slowly eradicate oppression of women.

As far as ladyship is concerned, her submission has been wrongly blown out of proportion. People provide good education & opportunities to their daughters & to the best of my knowledge '‘forcing the daughter into marriage’' in nowhere in sight of our urban life. Parents do help the daughters to choose their life partner.

As far as Income Tax /official asset declaration is concerned, all of us use provisions of IT rules to minimize our tax liability. For this purpose, almost everybody uses educational/health expenses of his dependents as liabilities. No interior meaning attached. I am sure, if that very judge had 2 sons, she would have placed both of them in same category too.

Sammelan Kavi (Software)     18 January 2011

good article

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     18 January 2011

ms avnish and ms utpala both are correct.

married women hesitate to accept the father's property; on the contray demand the property of father in law's.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register