LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

VISHNUMURTHY CHADALAWADA (.Executive Engineer)     14 December 2022

Wp dismissed as infrctuous wp was filed by petitioners

(1)WP dismissed as infructuous, wp was filed by petitioners( Govt) vishnu murthy (Respondent). in hyderabad   is it in favour of Respondent ? respondent filed  another WP, for promtion ( Vishnu murthy Petitioner , if, 1st wp dismissed  then the respondent( Govt) in 2nd Wp will consider in  2nd wp for promotion to the petitioner in 2nd wp, pl solve the problem

Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/create_message.asp



Learning

 6 Replies

P. Venu (Advocate)     14 December 2022

What are the facts? What is the context?

Real Soul.... (LEGAL)     15 December 2022

Confused quierest and confusing facts ,, If WP was for promotion and because of government employees retirement. the employee can no longer be promoted since his service has ended, therefore the WP is declared infructous ; The ordinance is neither in favor of Pet nor in favor of Resp. It is a normal course of events.

The question is if  the employee deserved promotion but was denied it during his employment and; if he would have been promoted under his right, which would have brought financial benefits, then why wouldn't the petitioner have claimed it in a writ petition, and if it is claimed in WP how come the petition became infroctous ,,, it turns out that the court was not  guided properly by the petitioner's cousel.

1 Like

VISHNUMURTHY CHADALAWADA (.Executive Engineer)     20 December 2022

Sir, The O.A filed in the year 2006 at APAT,Hyderabad.Disposed  on 21.01.2010, compiled the APAT orders without consequential  benefits of monetary benefits and given Promotions DM Gr.II,Gr.I , Dy.Executive Engineer and Executive Engineer. -In the year 2010 the respondents in APAT  filed a W.P. in the Hon'ble HC for suspension of APAT Orders in OA, .in the year 2014 the APAT  Hyderabad was windup and transfered pending cases to HC. The pending WP was  dismissed  as infructuous with reason that the respondent has retired from the Govt. Services .May I file contempt of court in the High Court. awating reply, Highly thankful to quick reply to my query. vishnu murthy

Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/details.asp?mod_id=227399&offset=1

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     20 December 2022

repeated

 

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/not-implementing-hon-ble-high-court-orders-in-toto-227399.asp

P. Venu (Advocate)     20 December 2022

The facts, as posted, are less thn convincing.

The APAT Orders having been complies with, why the WP?

The OA having been disposed of in 2010 and, also, Orders implemented, what is the relevance of winding up of APAT in 2014?

Retirement of the employee does not render the issue of promotion infructuous. Moreover, the directions of APAT  having been complied with, what is the cause of action for filing Contempt Petition?

 

VISHNUMURTHY CHADALAWADA (.Executive Engineer)     20 December 2022

sir, i got reply from the learned Senior Advocates, thanks .

 

 

 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register