Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Are judicial reforms necessary?

Page no : 2

R C Nigam (xxxxxxxxx)     18 March 2012

A litigant, aged above 76, fuming at the Tribunal's and the HC's working, retorted in the harshest words, telling that the Hon'ble Member of the Tribunal disposed off all his 5 petitions in 5 minutes, which were lingering for the last 7 years, and passed cursory Judgments: Whatever is due to the petitioner may be paid. In all the rest 4, he ordered to be reconsidered by the Govt Official, who had already rejected his representations. Regarding concealment of material FACTS, he casually mentioned that the Respondent had neither accepted nor denied the facts, brought out by the Petitioner. Height of callousness was further pecipitated when, after rejections of claim, the petitioner came back with a FRESH Petition, which was rejected as the same could not be filed within limitation period.

The HC, where a couple of appeals were filed, is behaving in a fashion to prove that there are KALMADIES of COMMENWEALTH GAME fame, sitting on every seat. Otherwise in the last 11 years the listing business would not have been so erratic that his WPs which was being listed every weak, has not been listed after 15.5.2011 till date, for a single time.

Is there any solution of this sordid affair?


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register