o sivasailanathan (advocate) 07 January 2012
in one 125 crpc petition both petitioner and respondant's evideces is over. now the question of jurisdiction raised by respondant out of petitioner's admission in cross and they also stated in thier counter also. but petitioner stated two places.. whether 462 crpc will save her or after completion of triel posted for orders.. whether the magistrate dismiss the petion only for the ground of jurisdictio... since hmop court is same jurisdiction
Nadeem Qureshi (Advocate/ nadeemqureshi1@gmail.com) 07 January 2012
Dear Friend
yes section 462 Crpc clearly says only faliure of justice, the order of that court colud be challenge otherwise not.
o sivasailanathan (advocate) 10 January 2012
yes my friend .. i think 1977 sc 1101 stated like..
i am going to argue the matter that 125crpc clearly says . it is only for the welfare of woman.. technical matters shoul not consider... and also 177
thanks
o sivasailanathan (advocate) 10 January 2012
yes my friend .. i think 1977 sc 1101 stated like..
i am going to argue the matter that 125crpc clearly says . it is only for the welfare of woman.. technical matters shoul not consider... and also 177
thanks
Prabodh Shukla (Advocate ) 10 January 2012
its for welfare of women and childerns ... and mark a duty upon husband to maintain his family i.e mother father,wife and issue
o sivasailanathan (advocate) 10 January 2012
my friend
i said husband
kindly read correctly
if son... that time father and mother appllicable
Shonee Kapoor (Legal Evangelist - TRIPAKSHA) 18 January 2012
This plea at this time would be considered frivolous.
Regards,
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
Member Strength 9,52,406 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
