in section 9 case, as a respondent, if i give a statement in my 'SAY' to her petition, which remains untouched in cross examination, then is it presumed to be 'accepted' by the court?
for example: if in my 'SAY' i state the "she came to my house, collected her belongings and went away to her home" which is contradictory to her stand in her section 9 case, where she states that she wants to live with me, and if my contention that 'she took away her belongings" remain untouched and unchallenged in my cross examination by her advocate, then is it implied by the court that my statement is correct or assumed to be correct in the eyes of the court, and stands accepted?
