1 section 8 of family court act 1984 bar the jurisdiction of magistrate in case of sec 125. Is this provision amended by high court or supreme court?
2 The relief in dv act 2005 under section 19 20 22 or 23 may be allowed in case domestic relationship and domestic violence proved by aggrieved and protection orders issued in section 18 by magistrate. Whenever orders under section 18 not issued by magistrate means no domestic violence occured. Please give the opinion.
3. Section 20 of act provide relief only in cases of losses and expenses occured due to domestic violence. Means without the domestic violence the orders can not be passed under section 20 also. Please give opinion.
4. section 20(6) it self the recovery procedure.
5. section 31 is remedial action in cases not complying the orders of magistrate. It is necessary that protection issued by the magistrate to register the case under section 31 of dv act. please give opinion.
6 Why the section 125(3) required to execute the decision of section 20 of DV Act 2005. It is just to try convert the wrong decision as right. Please comment
