amit jhaveri (managing partner) 20 January 2014
Justice J T Bhatia of Hon. Bombay High Court has passed a recent judgment that if a bank account is frozen u/s 102 CrPC then an action u/s 138 N I Act cannot survive...
If some one is able to find and forward this judgment I will be grateful and obliged.
Thank you
Nadeem Qureshi (Advocate/ nadeemqureshi1@gmail.com) 20 January 2014
search through nadeemqureshi1.wordpress.com
amit jhaveri (managing partner) 20 January 2014
not there
LAXMINARAYAN - Sr Advocate. ( solve problems in criminal cases. lawproblems@gmail.com) 07 February 2014
Please read the judgment properly.
Supreme court has held in such cases the accused should have paid after receipt of notice.
What the SC says that only bounce of cheque is no offense but not making the payment after receipt of notice of bouncing completes the offense.
Cheque bounce victims should take other valid defenses to come of the case.
Actual accused can ask for lectures FROM OUR EXPERTS friends on this issue through WHATSUP.
Member Strength 9,47,988 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
