Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

B S MURTHY   11 March 2017

Judicial procedure

Please clarify, as per the existing provisions of law, whether any
 client can file a suit / petition directly by himself and present /
 argue the case. If so, under what section / Act.

 


Learning

 5 Replies


(Guest)

Yes sir it's called as Party in person Eg.Consumer cases  can be represented by party in person


(Guest)
Originally posted by : B S MURTHY
Please clarify, as per the existing provisions of law, whether any
 client can file a suit / petition directly by himself and present /
 argue the case. If so, under what section / Act.

 

 

You can argue your case before a court of law, but not for your father or son, who have to engage a lawyer.

As a power of attorney holder for someone, you may sign sale deeds and agreements on his behalf, but you cannot argue for him in a court of law unless specifically permitted.

The Supreme Court has ruled that except for petitioner in person, no one other than advocates are permitted to argue cases on behalf of others. Even officials cannot argue a case in court on behalf of the company in which they are employed, it said.

 

"A natural person can, of course, appear in person and argue his own case personally but he cannot give a power of attorney to anyone other than a person who is enrolled as an advocate to appear on his behalf," ordered a bench of Justices Markandey Katju and Gyan Sudha Misra in an order last week.

"To hold otherwise would be to defeat the provisions of the Advocates Act," the bench said ruling out an ailing person giving power of attorney to his son to argue a petition filed by him in a court.

Even allowing a person to argue his case before a court is not a matter of right. "It is a discretion conferred by the Act on the court to permit anyone to appear in a particular case even though he is not enrolled as an advocate," it said.

That said, you should be aware of certain difficulties that you may face. No doubt, you would be the master of the facts of your case. But, you should also have a working knowledge of law, procedures and to some extent, the court-craft. If you don’t know the procedural and legal nuances, you may lose on important points. The courts have become slave to their own procedures. These procedures are required to followed mechanically even if they may appear to be ridiculous or obsolete. And, there are too many of them. Courts won’t allow you to digress from the established procedures. Even for filing a petition, there is a set procedure which may differ from court to court. Just to give an example, in Supreme Court, each annexure has be certified as true copy on its last page; in Delhi High Court each annexure has to be certified as true copy on each page; and, in Central Administrative Tribunal, each annexure has to be certified as true copy on the first and last page. So, you must know what to do where, otherwise you’ll have to keep spending your time and energy in curing the defects of filing, etc. After all, time also has some value in terms of money. This is just one requirement, there are so many others in each court. You’ll have to learn these by trial and error. This is not to scare you, but to caution you of the difficulties.

As it is said, practice makes a man perfect. By continuously practicing in a court, advocates acquire knowledge of the law and procedures in a court. If you want to fight your own case, you’ll have to learn the tricks of the game from square one and will have to master those skills quite fast, since you are learning at the cost of your own case.

You should also be aware that many of the presiding officers in the courts (i.e., the judges) may not look at the party in person in a favourable way. This is because a party in person may take extra time and say many unnecessary things and may not know the law and procedure; so, many judges lose patience. At the same time, I have seen some good judges who give a sympathetic hearing to a party in person. So, it all depends.

Thus, if you have an aptitude for law (and, more so, if you have a degree in law), go ahead and fight your own case in court, without engaging a lawyer. The law does not stop you from fighting your own case and you have every right to do so. It is only the lack of knowledge of law and procedure that may pose difficulties. One more option could perhaps be to fight your own case, but take guidance (about procedures and basic provisions of law) from some junior upcoming advocate who may not charge you much.

If you want to appear as PARTY IN PERSON you can file a Petition u/s 302(2) CrPC, 1973  for Criminal Cases and U/O-3 , R-1, C.P.C ,1908  for Civil Cases. 

 


(Guest)

I will be honest , if you study you are going to succeed else you will terribile fail  , but you need to undertsand one fact world bank  in one report have stated India 's Procedure code is highly complex and require simplicity. 

Even after reading many times and studying and presenting I really have some problem in Civil Procedure Code, I need to study again and again. 

Just for curosity sake which Case you are going to handle in person

(Generally my observation is those who have legal background take IN person case , means they have taken some service ,etc. and hence enrollment Bar Council has not given then such people generally take In Person cases ) 

 

B S MURTHY   11 March 2017

Thank you for your detailed, beautiful and pragmatic reply.


(Guest)
Originally posted by : B S MURTHY
Thank you for your detailed, beautiful and pragmatic reply.

yessmiley


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register