Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Sh. P Suresh (For To By Green Kindness Perpetuity Selfsustainability Always)     28 October 2016

Fight need be different from fight against aggressor.

# 1

28.10.16

 

Fight need be treated differently from fight against unexpected aggressor.



Learning

 7 Replies


(Guest)

OK, you can treart that as you liike.

 

Sh. P Suresh (For To By Green Kindness Perpetuity Selfsustainability Always)     29 October 2016

# 3

 

29.10.16

 

We have shared quiet some thoughts in the past. The last direct discussion, if I am not wrong was in 2012. Well, you have got a new email ID! Sir, it gives me great pleasure to have you back on my thread after a long long time. Welcome. Welcome very much. The thread was started with hopes of initiating discussion on:

 

                     "How does law treat this?"


(Guest)

Depends on whether violation of law is involved or not.

 

Sh. P Suresh (For To By Green Kindness Perpetuity Selfsustainability Always)     31 October 2016

# 5

 

31.10.16

 

This reply is not getting anywhere Sir. In the former, X attacks Y & it may involve motives, planning etc. It is for Y to act.

 

In the latter, showing the other cheek .... Oh, where are we, where are we. Can't blame X. Nothing works in practicality, only more harm gets done, even in the high profile groups & it is all spur of the moment you see. Nothing can be predicted & X can act in multiple ways. X can very well get offended / angry / anxious / surprised & counter the attack with attack. There are motives in the latter sort of attack too. "Y wants to silence some issue by force & thus X is vulnerable if he does not act". X is at least forced to act strategically later on. So X has to ring the bell, handle Y; put Y in his place in the full view of the society around & sound the deterrent. Lest, X's vulnerability increases that is all, at least in the today's deceitful society that it is all becoming (Society is turning more & more unethical, more & more cruel, cut throat, blatant & turning to conspiracy, conniving, tricking, cheating).

 

                     "What could X do? (What are the options before X?)"


(Guest)

In hypothetical cases or thoughts, nothing works practically. Better discuss the real issue/ problem, if there is any.

Sh. P Suresh (For To By Green Kindness Perpetuity Selfsustainability Always)     31 October 2016

# 7

 

31.10.16

 

Y owes money to X (More than 1 year) - Matter is known to quiet some people. X reminded Y on the dues 8-10 times. Nothing happened. X spotted Y & reminded again. Y thought it fit to silence X & fought with X without any other issue. X wants the money, justice & wants to plan strategically for safety.

Sh. P Suresh (For To By Green Kindness Perpetuity Selfsustainability Always)     02 November 2016

# 8

 

2.11.16

 

Summarily, it is assured that this is a real life happening. It is felt that actual Names, place etc identifiers should not be published & so has not been detailed.

 

              ------------XXXXXXXX---------------

 

For 6-7 months Y was absconding. Then, after 6 months, Y did drama of difficulties. After 3 more months X saw Y spending money like anything, but not paying the money that he owes to X. Then, X, a person who respects self dignity very highly realised that Y was misusing his goodness. Moreover, X is not in a position to allow such a thing when he himself is under dire straights; told Y of his own difficulties & wanted Y to pay the dues. Then  8 - 10 remainders. Last weel, X spotted Y again & remainded him of dues. This is when Y thought it fit to silence the issue & fought with X.

 

As already recorded, X wants the money, justice & wants to plan strategically for safety; factually also wants to cut Y to size & as well plan for insulation against brawl, undignified talks / fights, embarrassments etc.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register