Remember | Register | Forgot Password?
Bookmark This Page   RSS Feeds  Follow On Twitter


Search for Lawyers          

Please Wait ..

Discussion > Criminal Law > Procedure > Dna test of rape accused   Unanswered Threads Post New Topic

Pages : 1

There are 0 Replies to this message

Law Web123

[ Scorecard : 8364]
Posted On 26 January 2013 at 17:49 Report Abuse


It is necessary to conduct DNA test of Rape accused


 With regard to the matching of the semen, we find it

from Taylor's 2 Edn. (1965) Principles and Practice of Medical Jurisprudence as under:-
Spermatozoa may retain vitality (or free motion) in the body of a woman for a long period, and movement should always be looked for in wet specimens. The actual time that spermatozoa may remain alive after ejaculation cannot be precisely defined, but is usually a matter of hours. Seymour claimed to have seen movement in a fluid as much as 5 days old. The detection of dead spermatozoa in stains may be made at long periods after emission, when the fluid has been allowed to dry. Sharpe found identifiable spermatozoa often after 12 months and once after a period of 5 years. Non-motile spermatozoa were found in the v**gina after a lapse of time which must have been 3 and could have been 4 months."
44. Had such a procedure been adopted by the prosecution, then it would have been a foolproof case for it and against the Appellant.
45. Now, after the incorporation of Section 53 (A) in the Criminal ProcedureCode, w.e.f. 23.06.2006, brought to our notice by learned counsel for the Respondent-State, it has become necessary for the prosecution to go in for DNA test in such type of  
cases, facilitating the prosecution to prove its case against the accused. Prior to 2006, even without the aforesaid specific provision in the Cr.P.C. prosecution could have still resorted to this procedure of getting the DNA test or analysis and matching of semen of the Appellant with that found on the undergarments of the prosecutrix to make it a fool proof case, but they did not do so, thus they must face the consequences.
Supreme Court of India
Krishan Kumar Malik vs State Of Haryana on 4 July, 2011

To activate Click to Talk, e-mail at 

Related Files

Previous Thread
Next Thread

Related Threads

Post your reply for Dna test of rape accused

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to login

Not a member yet ?? Click here to signup



  • This is a public forum. Avoid posting content which you do not wish to disclose in public.
  • Use thank button to convey your appreciation.
  • Maintain professionalism while posting and replying to topics.
  • Try to add value with your each post.

Subscribe to the latest topics :

Forum Home | Forum Portal | Control Center | Who is Where | Popular Threads | Today's Topic | Recent Posts | Today's Posts | Post New Topic | Thread With Files | Top Threads - Month | Unreplied Topics | Forum Stats

web analytics