Remember | Register | Forgot Password?
Bookmark This Page   RSS Feeds  Follow On Twitter

 

Search for Lawyers          
    



Please Wait ..


Discussion > Civil Law > Procedure > Court's Jurisdiction   Unanswered Threads Post New Topic

Pages : 1


There are 1 Replies to this message


Dr. V.N.Tripathi


Advocate and Mediator, Allahabad High Court.
[ Scorecard : 9419]
Posted On 29 July 2009 at 00:53 Report Abuse

Dear friends,

Under domestic law, parties can make an agreement as to which court will have jurisdiction in case of any litigation. but, this rule is applicable only where more many courts have jurisdiction over the matter and parties can not confer jurisdiction on a court which has no jurisdiction at all.

in this regard, what is position with respect to foreign courts? i.e. can parties make an agreement giving jurisdiction to a foriegn court which would not have jurisdiction otherwise?



Total thanks : 2 times


Online certification courses in IP, IT and Social Media laws


Prakash Yedhula


Lawyer
[ Scorecard : 23423]
Posted On 29 July 2009 at 09:37 Report Abuse

In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has held that the parties to a contract can agree to submit to the exclusive or non-exclusive jurisdiction of a foreign “neutral” court, i.e., a court in a country to which none of the parties or the transaction under the agreement is in any way connected. The court clarified that such contracts are an exception to the well settled principle under section 20 of India’s Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), which stipulates that parties cannot by agreement confer jurisdiction upon a court, to which the CPC applies, if such court does not have jurisdiction otherwise. (Modi Entertainment Network v. W.S.G. Cricket Pte. Ltd., 2003 AIR SCW 733) 
 
 
While deciding the case, the Supreme Court considered two issues. The first issue was whether the parties to a contract can agree to have their disputes resolved by a foreign court (either a “neutral court” or a “court of choice”) by creating exclusive or non-exclusive jurisdiction on such court. The second one was whether the Indian party to a contract can seek an anti-suit injunction from an Indian court against the proceedings in a foreign court (the forum of choice agreed under the contract) on the ground that the Indian court has natural jurisdiction over the subject matter.
 
 
After detailed consideration, the Supreme Court held that while contracting with an Indian party, the foreign parties to the contract may choose to submit to the exclusive or non-exclusive jurisdiction of a foreign court, notwithstanding that none of the parties or the transaction under the agreement is not connected with such foreign court.
 


Total thanks : 2 times



Related Files



Previous Thread
Previous
Next Thread
Next

Related Threads


Post your reply for Court's Jurisdiction



Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to login


Not a member yet ?? Click here to signup

Message







    

  • This is a public forum. Avoid posting content which you do not wish to disclose in public.
  • Use thank button to convey your appreciation.
  • Maintain professionalism while posting and replying to topics.
  • Try to add value with your each post.





Subscribe to the latest topics :


Forum Home | Forum Portal | Control Center | Who is Where | Popular Threads | Today's Topic | Recent Posts | Today's Posts | Post New Topic | Thread With Files | Top Threads - Month | Unreplied Topics | Forum Stats


web analytics