Charge sheet contradictory with 161 statements


In FIR, stated that A harassed B for no reasons. In 161 statements LW1 to LW6 stated that during panchayat, B stated that C sent some obscene content and threatened her with dire consequences ,so she used to be in touch with him. And LW7 in his 161 statement said that during panchayat B said that she met with C in a marriage and since then they conversant with him and C sent nude images of other women and asked B to send simliar fotos of her so B sent same. And in chargesheet, police stated like this..During panchayat B admitted that, her relative C conversant to her at their village in a marriage function, since then she used to talk with him and sent some of her pics to him´┐Ż. So the police presented manipulated version on C in chargesheet just to protect him from becoming an accused . So what should be done now . Should A file. A) a 173(8) petition for further investigation in matter of C by stating contradiction in LWs 161 statements and the manipulation done by police in chargesheet B) complaining to district judge/ vigilance registrar of high court on the clerical staff for not correcting wrong translation (from Telugu to English) of 161 statement in chargesheet which is done by police with vested interest to omit C the s*xual harasser. C) complaining to higher police officers like SP this and request for further investigation D) private complaint in the same court Please suggest. Thanks a lot in advance.
 
Reply   
 
Lawyer in Hyderabad.Email:ramachary64@gmail.com

If police not filed F.I.R. you can approach criminal court and file private petition . 

 
Reply   
 


Advocate

A local advocate is a better position to suggest you the choice.
 
Reply   
 

Sir, FIR filed only on A , chargesheet also filed. During investigation the complainant and other witnesses stated harassment of C also on B. But police manipulated in the translation by omitting statements which attracts cognizable offence to C just to protect him from case. In short, police not booked C also as accused as per the new finding in investigation but presented different version other than 161 statements
 
Reply   
 

Sir, FIR filed only on A , chargesheet also filed. During investigation the complainant and other witnesses stated harassment of C also on B. But police manipulated in the translation by omitting statements which attracts cognizable offence to C just to protect him from case. In short, police not booked C also as accused as per the new finding in investigation but presented different version other than 161 statements
 
Reply   
 

Forget about the investigation report, the statement of the witnesses in it under section 161 Cr PC, and the charge sheet etc, but concentrate whether cognizance of the offences has been taken and the process issued by the court. Accused has no right to pray for further investigation under section 173(8) Cr PC. It is only police to request the court for further investigation. Police during investigation can add or subtract the name(s) of the accused, on the basis of the prime facie evidence (s). Wrong or faulty translation won't help the accused. Engage a reasonable local lawyer please.
 
Reply   
 
Advocate

I absolutely agree with OM PRAKJASH.

 
Reply   
 

LEAVE A REPLY


    

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



 

Search Forum:








×

  LAWyersclubindia Menu