a rastogi
04 June 2026 at 20:29
All hon'ble learned advocates,
Kindly suggest me on the below summarized matter, what should be done, I am worried about my heavy amount stuck in between..
CASE SUMMARY
Parties:
-- Buyer/Consignee: Neeru Rastogi (India)
-- Seller/Shipper: DigiKey Electronics (USA)
-- Carrier: FedEx
Transaction:
-- Electronics order placed with DigiKey.
-- Total order value approximately INR 47,000.
-- Shortly after placing the order, I realized that the wrong product variant had been selected.
Key Facts:
1. Before shipment movement, I notified both DigiKey and FedEx that I did not want the shipment and requested Return to Sender (RTS).
2. On 18 May 2026, I emailed FedEx requesting:
-- Refusal of shipment,
-- No customs clearance,
-- No BOE filing,
-- Return to Sender (RTS).
3. On 18 May 2026, I also emailed DigiKey requesting RTS and explaining that the order contained the wrong item.
4. Despite these communications, the shipment continued to move through the FedEx network and eventually arrived in India.
5. I repeatedly informed FedEx that:
-- I refused delivery,
-- I would not provide KYC,
-- I would not authorize BOE filing,
-- I wanted RTS.
6. DigiKey later confirmed in writing:
"I have sent a request to FedEx and have asked them to return the package to us."
7. FedEx subsequently created multiple case numbers and confirmed that RTS-related requests were under review.
8. FedEx later requested:
-- An abandonment/refusal letter from me,
-- An RTS declaration letter from DigiKey addressed to Customs,
-- DigiKey's FedEx account details for billing RTS charges.
9. DigiKey later stated that they could not share internal RTS details and also indicated that return may not be possible because the shipment had reached India Customs.
10. As of the latest communication:
-- Shipment has not been delivered to me.
-- I have not accepted the shipment.
-- I have not submitted KYC.
-- I have not authorized BOE filing.
-- No final written RTS approval or rejection has been communicated.
-- No final disposition of the shipment has been communicated.
Issues Requiring Legal Opinion:
1. What are my rights after notifying both seller and carrier of refusal before shipment movement/early transit?
2. Can DigiKey require me to accept delivery before allowing a return when RTS was requested before delivery?
3. If RTS is ultimately denied, who bears responsibility for costs incurred after repeated refusal notices?
4. If the shipment is abandoned, returned, or otherwise disposed of, what refund rights do I have?
5. Does the early refusal communication affect liability for shipping, customs, restocking, or return charges?
6. What consumer-protection remedies are available if the matter remains unresolved and funds remain blocked?
Documents Available:
-- Emails to DigiKey requesting RTS.
-- Emails to FedEx requesting refusal and RTS.
-- DigiKey emails confirming RTS request to FedEx.
-- FedEx case references and responses.
-- Shipment tracking history.
Regards.
Ankur
JAGADEESH
03 June 2026 at 13:38
Sir,
One of my cousins (sister) got married in 2016 and was blessed with a baby boy (9 years old). Her spouse traveled to Germany in 2017 and returned to India in 2022. Since then, he has been living in Hyderabad with his friends, while my sister and her son are in a rented house in Visakhapatnam. Her husband is not looking after them and is not providing a single paisa for them. So, what should we do now? How to safeguard her son's rights, and my sister wishes to initiate a divorce since her husband has not been employed for many years.
Manjunath Sompur
02 June 2026 at 15:29
The trail court passed an order of conviction for four years and fine under sec 468 and 420. High court reduced the period of conviction to one year with fine. supreme court confirmed the same. Now, can the accused file an application to trail court under PO Act?
Ratti Gulshanlal
02 June 2026 at 05:02
Central Government employees are deeply aggrieved by the Gazette Notification issued by the Ministry of Finance (Department of Economic affairs) (ECB & PR Division) dated 22 December 2003. This Notification has made the New Pension Scheme (NPS) would be mandatory for all new recruits to the Central Government Services from 01 January, 2004. Department of Pension and Pensioners Welfare (DoPPW) issued an Office Memorandum No. 57/05/2021-P&PW(B) dated 03 March, 2023 with a Subject - Coverage under Central Civil Services (Pension) rules, in place of National Pension System, of those Central Government employees who were recruited against the posts/vacancies advertised/notified for recruitment, on or before 22.12.2003.
Kindly issue a Pension Reform Office Memorandum/Circular stating that THE DATE OF VACANCY SANCTION/RELEASE LETTER BY THE CONCERNED MINISTRY OR DEPARTMENT MAY KINDLY BE TREATED AS DATE OF NOTIFICATION IF IT IS ISSUED PRIOR TO 22/12/2003. Such anomalies need to be rectified and the employees recruited against Vacancies released prior to 22/12/2003 may all be brought to the Old Pension Scheme
Anonymous
29 May 2026 at 16:44
-----------------------------------
Anonymous
28 May 2026 at 18:48
We are 5 siblings from Mumbai suburbs father died interstate in 1984 and mother died in 2019 we 5 siblings own tenanted building given by our grand father through registered partition deed in year 1955 our eldest brother was only a month Old in November 1955 and then grand father added his name as minor son as beneficiary along with our father . after our father's death he used to manage the property collecting rent etc.he made mutation entry in City survey property card without mentioning ratio but now He claims his ratio is 60 % as his name is already there in partition deed and even in mutation entry his name is there as minor son and father as a guardian. So what he is claiming is that legally correct please guide us .
Anonymous
25 May 2026 at 12:44
Plaintiff filed application for final decree and metes and bound. Property is owned by plaintiff ymother and defendant is daughter( sister to plaintiff) . Rights have been declared by preliminary decree . Plaintiff is entitle to 1/3rd share, Plaintiff father 1/3rd share and Defendant is entitle for 1/3rd share. Meanwhile Defendant son filed forged Gift Deed impleading himself in the partition suit claiming the property of his father (defendant husband) as donor with forged documents. My sister son is not necessary party to the partition suit. Can impleadment petition will be allowed and if allowed how can it decide the title of suit property after after declaration of shares in preliminary decree.
Please kindly advise what will be result of my preliminary decree when it has attained finality after Supreme Court confirming my preliminary decree.
Thank you
m.satyanarayana
25 May 2026 at 12:41
Plaintiff filed application for final decree and metes and bound. Property is owned by plaintiff ymother and defendant is daughter( sister to plaintiff) . Rights have been declared by preliminary decree . Plaintiff is entitle to 1/3rd share, Plaintiff father 1/3rd share and Defendant is entitle for 1/3rd share. Meanwhile Defendant son filed forged Gift Deed impleading himself in the partition suit claiming the property of his father as donor with forged documents. My sister son is not necessary party to the partition suit. Can impleadment petition will be allowed and if allowed how can it decide the title of suit property after after declaration of shares in preliminary decree.
Please kindly advise what will be result of my preliminary decree when it has attained finality after Supreme Court confirming my preliminary decree.
M.Satyanarayana
m.satyanarayana
25 May 2026 at 12:38
Plaintiff filed application for final decree and metes and bound. Property is owned by plaintiff ymother and defendant is daughter( sister to plaintiff) . Rights have been declared by preliminary decree . Plaintiff is entitle to 1/3rd share, Plaintiff father 1/3rd share and Defendant is entitle for 1/3rd share. Meanwhile Defendant son filed forged Gift Deed impleading himself in the partition suit claiming the property of his father as donor with forged documents. My sister son is not necessary party to the partition suit. Can impleadment petition will be allowed and if allowed how can it decide the title of suit property after after declaration of shares in preliminary decree.
Please kindly advise what will be result of my preliminary decree when it has attained finality after Supreme Court confirming my preliminary decree.
M.Satyanarayana
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Bangalore-us-rts(?)-digikey-fedex-moneystuck!
All hon'ble learned advocates,
Kindly suggest me on the below summarized matter, what should be done, I am worried about my heavy amount stuck in between..
CASE SUMMARY Parties:
-- Buyer/Consignee: Neeru Rastogi (India)
-- Seller/Shipper: DigiKey Electronics (USA)
-- Carrier: FedEx
Transaction:
-- Electronics order placed with DigiKey.
-- Total order value approximately INR 47,000.
-- Shortly after placing the order, I realized that the wrong product variant had been selected.
Key Facts:
1. Before shipment movement started even before allocating assigning AWB Number, I notified both DigiKey and FedEx that I did not want the shipment and requested Return to Sender (RTS).
2. On 18 May 2026, I emailed FedEx requesting:
-- Refusal of shipment,
-- No customs clearance,
-- No BOE filing,
-- Return to Sender (RTS).
3. On 18 May 2026, I also emailed DigiKey requesting RTS and explaining that the order contained the wrong item.
4. Despite these communications, the shipment continued to move through the FedEx network and eventually arrived in India.
5. I repeatedly informed FedEx that:
-- I refused delivery,
-- I would not provide KYC,
-- I would not authorize BOE filing,
-- I wanted RTS.
6. DigiKey later confirmed in writing: "I have sent a request to FedEx and have asked them to return the package to us."
7. FedEx subsequently created multiple case numbers and confirmed that RTS-related requests were under review.
8. FedEx later requested:
-- An abandonment/refusal letter from me,
-- An RTS declaration letter from DigiKey addressed to Customs,
-- DigiKey's FedEx account details for billing RTS charges.
9. DigiKey later stated that they could not share internal RTS details and also indicated that return may not be possible because the shipment had reached India Customs.
10. As of the latest communication:
-- Shipment has not been delivered to me.
-- I have not accepted the shipment.
-- I have not submitted KYC.
-- I have not authorized BOE filing.
-- No final written RTS approval or rejection has been communicated.
-- No final disposition of the shipment has been communicated since 17 days approximately.
Issues Requiring Legal Opinion:
1. What are my rights after notifying both seller and carrier of refusal before shipment movement/early transit?
2. Can DigiKey require me to accept delivery before allowing a return when RTS was requested before delivery?
3. If RTS is ultimately denied, who bears responsibility for costs incurred after repeated refusal notices?
4. If the shipment is abandoned, returned, or otherwise disposed of, what refund rights do I have?
5. Does the early refusal communication affect liability for shipping, customs, restocking, or return charges?
6. What consumer-protection remedies are available if the matter remains unresolved and funds remain blocked?
Documents Available:
-- Emails to DigiKey requesting RTS.
-- Emails to FedEx requesting refusal and RTS.
-- DigiKey emails confirming RTS request to FedEx.
-- FedEx case references and responses.
-- Shipment tracking history.
Regards.
Ankur