Displaying Queries 1 - 10 of 848 in 85 pages
|
| Filter Query :
All |
Only
Resolved |
Only Open
|
|
Rajesh Gurjar
asked On 21 May 2013 at 21:37
Answer this query now
|
whether a insurance company can be held liable for death of spare driver sleeping on goods loaded in body of a goods vehicle? policy is a comprehensive.
please reply with case laws
|
souren ghosh
asked On 19 May 2013 at 20:26
Answer this query now
|
My wife suddennly departed to her parents place along with all her belongings, ornaments and my daughter on 01/04/2013 following an acute wrangle and hot arguments with me on 31/03/2013. She left my house when i had been to office.I have intimated the case to the local police station. i am trying all efforts to get her back. But she is not interested. in the mean time i have sent her money through money order thrice and that she has accepted.i am at a fix about what she is going to do. she is asking for a mutual divorce and asking for 30 lac whereas i am not interested to do the same. i love my daughter like anything. please help me with your valuable advice.
|
|
venkatesh Rao
asked On 17 May 2013 at 22:15
Answer this query now
|
My sister and brother in law were taking care of own great aunt and uncle of brother in law who were issuless. They left thier self acquired house under a will to the elder son of my sister and as he was a minor, my sister was made guardian and khata was accordingly made.
The son is now 45 yrs and he has out of his own will executed a relinquish deed in favour of my sister. Then khata changed to my sister. she has been paying taxes and enjoying the possssion.
My question is whether relinquishment deed is enough? OR should her son execute gift deed? can my sister raise loan from bank mortgaging the house?
Learned experts, kindly clarify.
|
surjit singh
asked On 08 May 2013 at 07:52
Answer this query now
|
1. Whether a married women borne before 1956 (i.e. before the enactment of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956)and married after 1956 has got the right to claim the share in the ancestral property.
2.Whether a married women borne before 1956 (i.e. before the enactment of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956)and married before 1956 has got the right to claim the share in the ancestral property.
I may add that the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2004 entitles a female to have her share in the ancestral property.
|
|
Suresh Babu Rai
asked On 30 April 2013 at 11:26
Answer this query now
|
Morning Members!
The petitioner/plaintiff has filed a suit for perpetual injunction and also filed an IA therein under 39, R.1 & 2 of CPC against Respondents/Defendant No.1 to 4. The Hon’ble Court pleased to issue urgent notices to the respondents and fixed the date of appearance on 15.04.2013. On that date I have filed a memo offering to file my vakalath on behalf of all the respondents in the next date and requested time for filing of counter to defend the subject matter of the petitioner/suit. The petitioner prayed to pass statusquo orders till the date of my request, as such the court pleased to direct us to maintain statusquo and posted the matter to 22.04.2013. On the said date I have filed my detailed counter clearly and categorically stating the true facts behind back of petition under O.39, rule 1 and 2 of CPC. In fact the petitioner before filing of the suit has executed a GPA in respect of suit house to the respondent No.1 and the respondent No.3 have purchased the same from the respondent No.1 through a Regd. Sale Deed in which the petitioner/plaintiff acted as principal vendor as per the provisions of Indian Registration Act. I have also filed two third party affidavits of neighbors of respondent No.3 denying the possession of the petitioner/plaintiff over the suit house along with their attested copies of ration cards for the proof of their identity.
The petitioner/plaintiff with an intention to drag the matter have filed a petition under 19, rule 2 to summon the third parties for the purpose of cross examine them to illicit the truth that their signatures are tampered and they do not know the contents of their affidavits filed support of petition filed under order 39, rule 1 and 2 of CPC.
I have filed a counter showing the ill intention of the petitioner to drag the statusquo orders passed in O.39; R. 1 & 2 of CPC the petitioner has filed the present application as the justice delayed is justice denied. It is not the junction to cross examine the third parties to decide the O.39 R.1 and 2 application and they can summon in the main suit and court can frame an issue in this regard and can settle that issue in the main suit. The matter is posted for arguments of both sides.
Any suggestions please…
Thank you one and all.
|
Gitesh Kumar Shyamkuwar
asked On 10 March 2013 at 20:59
Answer this query now
|
who is responsible for holding election of the trust.In case of President is dead. One trustee tender his resignation in 2003 and his resignation accepted in General Meeting which was held by president and the decision sent to said trustee.He filed a suiit under 41A BPT act for non calling in trust affairs the same was rejected by Ass.Charity Commissioner.But he submitted change report before Asst.Charity Commissioner.How it is possible uneder BPT Act
|
Azhar
asked On 01 March 2013 at 20:50
Answer this query now
|
sir my fellow senior filed a case which sumarised here as under,
The plaintiff wanted to purchase a shop of the defendent and for that purpose bith have decided to execute sale deed but before making full payment plaintiff has give some of the payment to the defendent as part payment and the same was registered than after the defendant handower the said property/shop to the plaintiffand he had the possesssion of that shop but than after whern he asked further payment than defendant asked him to make him sale deed first since than problem arise, the plaintiff had to take loan from the bank and he was welling to pay buy the said property was already mortgaged by the defendant therefore the plaintiff asked the defendant to clear the tiltle of the property.Within that period plaintiff had doubt that he will asked to vacate the shop so he filed the suit regarding the injunction but before passing the order the defendant vacate him from the shop and took possession of the said shop by fore at night. Thanafter lot's application given in to the court for contempt. ultimately court has given the injunction to th in e plaintiff. than defendant moved to session court session court turn the judgment of the lower court so again the origenal plaiintiff who is appelant now preffered an apeal to gujarat high court to stay the order of the session court and all other operation, court has given this relief on first hearing now mater is adjourned and will be heared. Now plaintiff ha filed application in the lower court that, now the judgement of the lower court is survive and come in to the existance because the order of the session court is stayed by the Hon'ble High court so defendant filed the W.S. and raised the objection and submitted that, High court has just given the relief which is for the stay of execution and not decided the whole matter so that suck kind of application is not tenable before this court because the matter is still pending before the high court......
Now is ther any judgment of the Hon'ble S.C.court in the favour of the present appellant that he is entitle for the possession of the said shop.
|
Adv.Vishal Anil Vyavahare
asked On 15 February 2013 at 09:35
Answer this query now
|
Hi Sir ,
My clients grandfather had a DEVSTHAN INAM Land and on 7/12 extract his name was inducted in 1966 he mortgaged his land 21 years with ONE PERSON but after 2 years of that mortgage that ONE PERSON purchased DEVSTHAN INAM Land from My clients grandfather by taking advantage of his illiteracy and without any permission of Appropriate Authority. and now that land is in possession of that ONE PERSON and 7/12 extract contain his name with Crop Inspetion. So after 40-45 years whether there is any Remedy for my client regarding that Land. please suggest.
Thanks,
Vishal A. Vyavahare
Advocate Chandwad (Nashik)
|
|
bala subrahmanyam
asked On 06 February 2013 at 15:41
Answer this query now
|
Respected Experts,
Plz. suggest me suitably. My question is:
"A" is the Owner and "B" is the tenant. Both of them have executed a Lease Deed/Rental Agreement and got it registered.
Now "A" wants to alienate the said leased premises to 3rd party. I heard from my colleagues that "A" should get prior consent about the alienation from "B".
Suggest me whether it is correct or not. If so quote the Section of Law.
Thanks
|
Aniket Ahiwale
asked On 04 February 2013 at 18:39
Answer this query now
|
Hi,
I have been a Maharashtra resident since birth. I wish to purchase Agriculture land in Maharashtra legally to start farming . My Grandfather owned agri land in Satara District. He sold the land in 1993. After that we have never owned an agri land. My uncle (Fathers elder brother ) has an old farmers certificate issued in 1993. Can we buy land in Maharashtra on the basis of the farmers certificate. If not is there a legal provision to buy agri land. I have heard that I can apply to the collector u/s 63 of Maharashtra land act. If required kindly let me know of the required format.
|
