asked On 08 July 2010 at 23:20
Answer this query now
The primary objective of the presentation titled “The flaw in the law” is to get the LA Act, 1894 amended in respect of addition of a section to that law to prescribe for the compulsory registrability of the notification u/s 4 (1).
The proposed Land Titling Bill 2010 of the Govt. of India, proposes the very same point .
Therefore, I consider it time now to acknowledge the valuable help and support rendered by
Sri. R.K.Makkad, Sri. Niranjan, Sri.Aravindan s/o Ganesan, Ms.Parveen Agarwal ,Sri. Assumiki, Sri. Y.V.Vishweshvar Rao, Sri.Kiran Kumar, Sri.A.V.Vishal,Smt.Rakhi Budhiraja, Sri.Rajeev, Ms.UmaParameswaran, Sri.Devajyoti Barman, ,Sri.Bagwat Patil, ,Sri.Arup Kumar Gupta,Sri.Ram Samudre, , Sri.ShasiKumar, Sri.Chanchal Nag Chowdhury, Sri.Pawan Sharma,Sri.Parthasarathi Loganathan, Sri.SKJ,Ms.Archana,Sri.B.K.Raghavendra Rao,Sri.Daksh,Ms.RuchiGupta,Sri.SivaSubramanian,Sri.MuraliKrishna,Sri.MukulAggarwal,Sri.VirendarPankaj,Sri.K.C.Suresh,Sri.Mahendrakumar,Sri.Kamaraj Bharathy and others
in the process of clarification of my doubts and thus towards the structure of my presentation titled “the Flaw in the Law”
Though the extent of contribution ranges from the low to high on a scale of 1 to 1000, I sincerely thank each and every one.
If there is one person to be mentioned in isolation by virtue of maximum contribution, it is none other than Sri.R.K.Makkad.
I thank the Supreme Courts of the United Kingdom,Singapore, Australia, and NewZealand, the U.K.Law Commission, and Mrs Ang Moo San of Singapore Land Authority for their kind and express contribution in this regard.
I also thank Sri. S.V.Nahar and Sri.Sudershan Goel of lawguru.com in this regard.
My special thanks should go to the administration of lawyersclubindia.com and lawguru.com and the inventor of internet for providing the plat form to materialize the whole 3 months old story.
If I had left out some one’s name in the list of contributors, kindly pardon me.
Thank you all, Ladies and Gentlemen!