How to get back our ancestral property

our ancestors purchased an rural agricultural land in 1934 for a consideration and we also got a patta from the seller since then we also paid sitts ...after the death of our supergrandfather our grandfathers are not aware of that land and it was used for cultivation to some extent & the balance is left empty till 2000 BUT THEY DIDNOT ENTERED THEIR NAMES IN REVENUE RECORDS BECAUSE THEY ARE ILLETARATES in 2000&then the ANDHRAPRADESH government issued DKT PATTA's to outsiders....but actually our family members are not having much land & THEY ARE ILLETARATES.......now I GOT THAT PATTAS IN 2008 SINCE THAT DAY I'M TRYING TO GET A SOLUTION FOR MY PROBLEM.........I.E., WHETHER CAN WE GET THAT LAND BACK TO OUR NAMES BECAUSE WE DONT HAVE SUFFICIENT LAND. (TOTAL MEMBERS IN OUR FAMILY NOT HAVING EVEN 2 ACRES ARE -18MEM)
HOW TO SOLVE MY PROBLEM?
**SIMPLY**
DATE OF PURCHSE - 1934

PURCHASED BY - MYGRANDFATHER'S FATHER

TYPE OF PURCHASE - REGISTER DOCUMENT

IN OUR POSSESSION - TILL 1990'S

REVENUE RECORDS - NOT IN OUR NAMES

TO WHOM DKT PATTA - OUTSIDERS OF OUR VILLAGE
ISSUED BY APGOVT

REASON FOR NOT - WE ARE NOT AWARE &
ENTRY NAMES INTO ILLETARATES
REVENUE RECORDS

DATE OF REGISTERED - 2008
DOCUMENT FOUND TO ME

LANDLESS MEMBERS IN - 6MEMBERS
OUR FAMILY

Query on inherited property

My sister in law's mother passed away in april 2013 in chennai.she had two sisters and one brother as her children. her husbank died about three years back.

mother had a property (agricultural land) held along with her sister as ansesteral property in tamilnadu.
about 20 years back, she had told her brother in law to sell the property and give her Rs 3000 needed by her for her dauthter's marriage.thus her sister came with her husband and gave the money and told her that property has been sold though no signature has been taken.
now mother's sister is asking them to give a POA in the name of son(my sister in law's brother)to enable them to sell the property. though my sister in law is willing to sign since she does not want any property or money from the land, following are her doubts:
1. Can there be any problem if she signs the document.?
2. Will she have any tax liability after signature.?
3. By signing the POA can there be any legal problem to my sister in law?

Land ceiling act

Dear Sir,

We aware that the Land Ceiling Act is a Law in India. We are looking for permission for large corporate agriculture in thousands of acres land with the tie-up & help of foreign technology.
We have queries regarding:
1) How can we get permission for same from government revenue department?
2) Is there any other person having similar permission earlier in any state of India? Plz mention the same?
3) What will be procedure for the same?

Thanks.

Right to property received by parents by way of partition deed

Hi ,

My mother receuvd property from her parents by way of partition deed in 1989, adn now she has given it to me. HOwever, my brother has now filed a case for a share of the property . Does my mothe rhave all the roght to do what she wants with teh property. I could not understand the Joint family abolition ACt in kerala.... Can you please help... My brother is not intouvch with my mother for the last 6 years now and has filed a case when she has given me the property.. PLease advice... Does his petition stand valid? Do my mother have no right to do what she wants with her property?

Thanks
Deepti

Property

we are three brother presently we are living in joint family. Yet property is not divided by my father, my question is before 20 yrs back my father his own fund purchase a land of 12 acre in the name of our elder brother. now father want to share this 12 acre land among 3 brother. But elder brother is not interested to gives ours two brother share. Can we claim or father do any legal action. Property is in the nameof elder brother,

Lease agreement property

Respected Sir,

Query Regarding to purchase property on lease agreement.

I Sudip Raja currently leave in Gondal City (Dist. Rajkot, State – Gujarat). I want to buy a property on lease agreement. At present there is total two owner of this property. (1) First & original owner is APMC (Agriculture Produce Marketing Yard Committee). (2) Second Owner is who at present use this property on 98 years lease agreement. I buy this property from second owner. When second owner buy this property from marketing yard in year 2001 at that time property cost Rs. 4 Lakh. This 4 lakh value is only land value. After acquire this land second owner construct a godown on this land which value Rs. 2 Lakh. At present in year 2013 this property market value Rs. 1 crore approx.
As per marketing yard lease agreement terms & condition no one have right to sale this property and also no one have to right to give this property on rent basis. Means second owner have no right to give on rent basis or also no right to sell it.
Now if I buy this property then I get only Rs.4 lakh lease agreement and Rs. 2 Lakh construction value it means total Rs. 6 Lakh I get on my account book. All other Rs. 94 Lakh that I have to pay in black money format.
I want to pay all money in white format because this property I buy on support of bank loan. Now Bank requirement is that if there is no any register document with property register office of government then how we give you loan? Also in marketing yard lease agreement they give in written that all schedule, private bank have right to give loan on this property. But bank are not accepted this they want registered document.

So, Respected Sir, Is there any way as per Indian government and Gujarat government property law that I will buy this property in white format money and I also register it with register office of government and also bank clear my loan?

Sudip Raja
M. 9427721997

Property sharing

My father having two wives, one wives was died and having one son.and after first wives died my father married with my mother having two sons including myself . how will property share will be among brother. we are now joint family and 40 acres land from my grandfather. another 12 acre land purchase my father and having in the name of first son.
thus our total land is 52 acres.
my question is...
1) Property will equally share among three brother ?
2) Half property goes to first wives son and half to second wives two son.
3)what about father's self acquired property but in the name of first wives son. is it will equally share? can he dines same

Ancestral property

We are five brothers and five sisters of my father (decesed)Three of us are first wife son (father and mother not alive)My father married to second wife she had five sisters and 2 sons.

We have 100 years old house of grand father situated at
Tamilnadu and a self acquired property of a house by my father.

Since my father and my eldest brother are not alive now, who are all eligible to get the shares in the event of properties are sold to a builder. Will the daughers(MY SISTERS) (married prior to 1980) eligible for share as well the eldest son who got released by a release deed in 1980,his son and daughters are eligible or not?
(refer Hindu succession act 2005)

pl clarify the points.
Thanks.

pk srinivasan

Explain clause 27(2) under essential services act

on coming to understand that a trespasser had created forged documents using false survey number had applied for electrical connection quoting my survey number and in my vacant residential land, I had immediately written to the Assistant Engineer of T.N.E.B not to provide any electrical connection in the name of the trespasser who was trying to grab my land with false documents.I had enclosed copies of all my documents, the vacant land tax receipt, my police complaints against the trespasser and the F.I.R filed against him. Accordingly,the A.E also refused permission to the trespasser citing these grounds - immediately, the trespasser had filed a writ petition in the Madras High Court in which he had deliberately dragged my uncle(When I had launched all the objections as the owner of the land) who is not at all in any way involved in this and also the A.E. T.N.E.B as respondents.
Under normal judicial process, the writ itself ought to have been dismissed by the court due to the wrong person involved rather than me, but surprisingly the judge had taken up the matter and passed a very ridiculous order which states that "the petitioner(trespasser)in no way established his title rights over the disputed property". However it surprisingly instructs the Asst.Engineer, T.N.E.B to use discretion as to whether a temporary electrical connection could be granted or not because any essential service like an electrical connection is the basic right of any individual under Section 27(2)of Essential Services Act and this being so, the trespasser is entitled for an electrical connection - the judgement of an High Court Judge is all the more ridiculous because, at the very start of his judgement the judge has observed that the petitioner(trespasser) has not established his title right over the property - This being the case, how he can be given such a service that too in a property that belongs to me?? - The judgement should have been that I as the owner of the property should not be denied such a right!!!
More surprising and shocking is that the judge concludes his judgement by stating that the petitioner(trespasser)cannot claim any ownership or possession of the property merely due to receiving a temporary electrical connection in his name.
Does it not go to show the extent of rot in our judicial system in which such a ridiculous and laughable judgement could be passed by an High Court Judge???!!!!!!!!
I understand that I have an opportunity to appeal against this judgement at Madras High Court itself.
I would like to know from eminent jurists in this forum as to what course of action I must take to get this judgement reversed - I am sure you all agree with me.
Thanks.

Clause 27(2) under provision of essential services act.

In a judgement to a writ filed by the trespassers/Petitioner against myself and the Asst.Engineer-T.N.E.B-Respondents at the Madras High Court, for issue of electricity in their name(in my survey number) to which I had objected and also sent a legal notice to the Asst.Engineer-T.N.E.B not to grant any permission for electrical connection to the trespassers/petitioner in my land survey number which they have illegally occupied and also illegally constructed a small shed with the help of local police. The petitioner/Trespassers had illegally registered the sale deed using bogus 'patta' and other forged documents.

While the Judge had observed that the petitioner/trespasser has not established his legal rights over the property due to the registration of bogus documents, he has instructed the Asst.Engineer-T.N.E.B to use discretion in granting a 'temporary' electrical connection to the trespassers/petitioner in my land survey number under section 27(2) of provision of essential services which he has observed a 'Basic Civic Right' of an individual and that such right should not be denied.
This is highly ridiculous and mockery of interpretation of a law under Indian judicial system as it is very clear that the petitioner/trespasser does not hold any rights over the property or has any clear title to the property - when this is the case where is the question of denial of provision of essential services under section 27(2) under provision of essential services act??

It is most disheartening to note the deliberate or otherwise error on the part of the judge in coming to conclusions without proper verification of land document of both the sides.

I now fear, whether my right over the property will be ultimately denied to me due to the fact that the opposite side is using money and influence to their benefit and that they may claim 'possession' over my land.

I would like to know whether I will be seriously affected by such a ruling? or
Whether this ruling is to my advantage?

Browse By Category

• Business Law - 3586
• Civil Law - 14526
• Constitutional Law - 1780
• Criminal Law - 12284
• Family Law - 9095
• Labour & Service Law - 5307
• Legal Documents - 3025
• Intellectual Property Rights - 737
• Property Law - 12379
• Taxation - 3766
• Students - 2116
• Others - 8876