Compounding of 406 and 506
Shailender KAUSHAL
(Querist) 03 August 2015
This query is : Resolved
Even after having come in to compromise and complainant has given statement in the sessions court to compound the charges the court still asking for arguement to continue for co -accused where as main accused already been given relief after compromise under section 482crpc and quashing of the FIR
Judge at Punjab Highcourt wanted to know if the charges can be compounded even after conviction or not ....
Kindly help....
SAINATH DEVALLA
(Expert) 03 August 2015
Gentleman,
What is the case actually?Come out with facts of the case for a good suggestion
Shailender KAUSHAL
(Querist) 04 August 2015
WE have on going case at Patiala and as advised by teh advocate that if yougetin to compromise case willsettle 100% and we paid the money as this was moneymatter but session court was not ready to give time we approached High court ... an d high court asked for statement by complainant for re assurance that compromise is without coercion in betwen judge in High Court changes and he asked if the quashing possible after conviction.
So advocate there thought Judge may give decision against us he withdrwas the application.... and orders to approach appalate court for remedy for compounding of the charges.
where as 406/506 are compoundable charges
Please advise thanks
SAINATH DEVALLA
(Expert) 04 August 2015
UR entire reply is not clear.U mentioned about conviction,were U convicted by the sessions court?
Once convicted what does UR lawyer mean by quashing? Wrongly approached or adviced.
Shailender KAUSHAL
(Querist) 04 August 2015
Sir Conviction at trial court and same been chalanged at Session Court where with courts permission got into compromise as advised and checked both sections 406 and 506 are compoundable and once both parties have entered in to compromise the FIR in question needs to be quashed or compounded at appellate court
