Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

FIR 37/2004 dt. 18.2.2004 u/s 385/384/354 IPC

(Querist) 28 August 2009 This query is : Resolved 
From her office record under RTI Act 2005 they informed me her papers cancelled in November 2002 instead of December 2002 next paper started from 27th May 2003 instead of 27th June 2003 and result declared of these SO Grade Exam on 11.12.2003 not in September 2002 or in November 2003. DW verify this record.

Smt. Asha Arya registered a case FIR 37/2004 dated 18.2.2004 she was on leave from 11th Feb 2003 to 19 April 2003 after joining her duty she wrote two letter both letters were verified in Defense witnesses because in her cross she denied her signature on the letter and said she was not admitted that she wrote two letter to her office on 20.4.2005 those letters are as follows case is State v/s Avinash Kumar Seth (self)


Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi-110002, without any influence and pressure from any body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated.


Sd/-
20/4/2005 true copy attested by Sh. Chaman Bhandari Sr. AO
(Asha Arya) 20/7/2006


To
Shri V.S. Chauhan
PA to Sr. DAG (Admn.)


Dated: 20.4.2005


The above letter verified by Mr. Chaman Bhandari as Defence Witness



To

The Sr. Dy. Acctt. General (Admn.),
O/o the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi,
AGCR Bldg.,
New Delhi-110002


I, Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi without any influence and pressure from an body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false, baseless and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated. I apologize to the office and Sh. V.S. Chauhan for my wrong doings and I assure you Sir that such type of things will not occur in future.


Sd/-
Dated: 20.04.2005 (ASHA ARYA)
Witness

1 J.B. Gupta
AO (Estt.) Sd/- 20/4/05

2 Jawahar Lal
A.O. (Admn.)
O/o (Audit) Delhi Sd/- 20/4/05



“Sr. DAG (Admn & A/CS)’’
Dy. No…….62……….
Date……21/4…..

The above letter verified by Defence witness one Mr. J B Guta & Mr. Jawahar Lal

I never massage on her abdomen and never threat her for money false aligation on me.

She borrow money from my wife Rs.1100/- and also she use to borrow money from other office colleagues this was verified by the bank statement of the complainant as well as the bank authorities.

Now the case is for final arguments on the above letters can i won the case or not?
A. A. JOSE (Expert) 28 August 2009
Which case and against whom. Kindly furnish complete and definite details alongwith case details.
PARTHA P BORBORA (Expert) 29 August 2009
a quary shuld be asked in a spacific point or subject.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :






Course