Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

req-for reply

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 17 February 2011 This query is : Resolved 
sir,
I have asked a query regasding the acp (tp) ghmc reply to the high court in his reply to the contempt case filed against him and the zonal commissoner.
Do these observation of his invite further contempt actions against him?
SANJAY GUPTA (Expert) 18 February 2011
kindly write full form of short typed word in your question.
Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 18 February 2011
sir,
I filed a contmpt case aginst acp (tp), zonal commissioner of GHMC and one mr.x in the High Court of AP for not stopping an illegal construction inspite of the High courts stay order.
we reported to the ghmc that the illegal construcgtion which is being constructed in the common area of our apartments is still being carried out and the ghmc did not try to stop it.
in the counter affadavit filed by the asp (tp) in reply to the contempt case the acp (tp) who is also represnting the zonal commissioner stated that the regularizastion applied by mr.x has been rejected and the corporation would take steps to demolish the structure immediately. this was on 5th july 2010.
in his counter affadavit the acp(tp) made an statement that the portion where the structure was made is being used only by mr.x and no one in the apartment is using the same. Has the acp (tp) any right to put in this observation. if none of the owners are using any part of the common area do they loose the right to the common area.
he has also misguided the high court that the ghmc has stopped the construction prior to the orders of the high courts stay order.which is false as we have been regulary complaining to them that the construction is being carried out through phone (which i hav recordings of the conversastion) and also thru letters addressed to them.
if the construction was stopped before the orders of the high court what is the necessity to approach the high court and get a stay order.
the acp (tp) claims that they issued a notice on feb 9th 2010 and stopped the construction nwhile the high courts order was given on 5th march 2010.
Mr.x applied for regularizastion on 4th march 2010. if the construction was stopped how can mr.x apply for regularizastion.
Does not the actions of the acp (tp) come under further contempt of case.
And also Mr.x has taken a status quo in the 3rd addl. chief judge (which is still pending in the court) has not exceeded his limits by going to the lower court when the matter is pending in the high court.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :