Rahul Dhingra
11 October 2013 at 21:14
Dear all
Greetings
My wife filled the 498a case and everything done on worst part like jail and all now case is in lower court.
I have fille some rti against police chargsheet on fake charges and arrest. Can I file the case in high court for quashing the 498a case against me and my family taking rti as a proof.
Please suggest if possible the best solution for the same.
Ajit Prasad
09 October 2013 at 19:23
Hi
I got married as per Hindu act in Delhi in May 2013.
After a month, I found that she had physical relations with a couple of people before marriage . The source was that I had got hold of some of the tests that she had been asked to do Chlamydia was one of this test.
Later , when I confronted her , she begged to continue our marriage and I had agreed. Now Last month, her parents came to take her to their home in Kanpur saying that she will come back after 10 days , however even after 20 days she has not come back and not picking my calls.
Now I am afraid that she has a malicious intent and may want to implicate me in false cases.
I am afraid that since she in Kanpur and I am in Delhi that if she files a complaint against me in Kanpur, police may arrest me, take to Kanpur.
Is there any precautionary step which I can take to avoid this arrest.
WHAT IF , IMMEDIATELY I GO TO MY LOCAL POLICE STATION AND FILE A COMPLAINT (NOT FIR) STATING THAT SHE HAS GONE WITH HER PARENTS WILLINGLY AND THAT SHE CAN THREATEN ME & MY FAMILY AND HENCE DO NOT GIVE ANY IMPORTANCE TO HER. I CAN ALSO GET THE DIARY NUMBER OF THE COMPLAINT
WILL THIS AVOID IMMEDIATE ARREST IF SHE FILES A FALSE COMPLAINT? I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS WILL BE TAKEN AS A DISPUTED MATTER AND IF KANPUR POLICE COMES , WE CAN STATE THE COMPLAINT THAT WE HAVE ALREADY MADE AND IT WILL BE TAKEN AS A COURT MATTER AND NOT IMMEDIATE ARREST.
PLEASE LET KNOW YOUR ADVICE.
Raj
09 October 2013 at 18:18
Sir, My familu & I falsely implicated under 498-A/125/DV Cases and the matter is pending before the Ld JMIC, Hon'ble High Court and Hon'ble Supreme court of India..I received an order sheet ( Hukumnama) in which I am directed to appaer before the DSP office of remote area on tommorow
Since the matter is pendinhg before the courts, I consulted my lawyer he advise me not to attend as there could be fur5ther implaications as girl father is influentail perosn at area..Please advise what should I do?
I have already send the e-,mail to the Police office and I ahve send the letter by speed post informing about the case..Is this sufficient?? Whether police can arrest me if I don't attend their office...I am already on the regular bail given by the court
jai shankar keshri
09 October 2013 at 10:23
if an accused is declared an absconder during investigation and entire process in order to secure his attendance has already been passed by the order of Chief Judicial Magistrate and thereafter the police submits chargesheet and the case record is transferred to another magistrate for trial and disposal. Now the magistrate in charge once again issues the process for the second time against the same accused. Is that legally correct ? Please help with related citations
Yamalapalli Haribob
26 March 2012 at 15:59
I have filed a case under section 138 of ni act basing on the bouncing cheque.My case is that the accused borrowed amount under promissory note and later issued cheque for the same for discharging of debt due under pronote.The cheque was bounced and i filed complaint.The trail was also commenced and i have marked the pronote as exhibit in NI act case.After that , i have forgotten to file suit under pronote and same was barred by limitation.MY question is whether i will win NI act case.The accused have taken a plea that as the pronote is barred by limitation,there is no legally enforceable debt and is entitled for acquittal.What i have to do to save my case.
Anonymous
11 December 2011 at 12:30
WHETHER DEMAND IS NECESSARY IN NOTICE TO CONSTITUTE OFFENCE UNDER NI ACT
Anonymous
19 February 2011 at 19:30
one possessor y agreement produced by defendant in a suit.he also paid stamp duty penalty and the same was marked.previously the said document was produced by defendant before rdo for cancellation of passbook of plaintiff.At that time there are only 2 attestors on the said agreement.at time of producing of said document before court there are 4 attestors on the document.plaintiff obtained cc of agreement from rdo.but the court is refusing to mark the document and insisting to pay stamp duty on agreement.what i do .please advise.
Anonymous
25 December 2010 at 18:36
R/experts,
Can widow claim any right in the immovable or other pecuniary property of her first husband's family after remarriage? If yes,by which section and which act.
D S DOCTOR
25 December 2010 at 18:12
CAN ACCUSE ENTILE TO GET EVIDENCE WHICH WILL BEFORE THE FRAMING OF CHARGE IN WARRANT TRAIBLE CASE INSITUE ON OTHER THEN POLICE,PL PROVIDE JUDGEMENT OF APEX COURT
Member Strength 9,49,507 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
agreement of sale.
whether agreement of sale can be ammended to rectify the boundries in a suit for specific prrformance which is pendind.