Anonymous
01 October 2019 at 21:13
Dear Experts,
Greetings of the day!
I have done my graduation with 44% marks and have qualified my MBA Degree From IGNOU with 65% marks.
Last year only I enrolled myself for LLB with one of affiliated college of CCS University.
Now, somebody told me that I am not eligible to get enrolled with BCI even after I will complete my LLB.
I am wondering how can the college take my admission in case I am not eligible for BCI registration.
Please Share your opinion. I am in a big tension. I am unable to decide should I go further in LLB or should I leave the course here..
Thanx in advance
Anonymous
01 October 2019 at 16:18
Can a committee block email communication of a member marking a copy to other flat owners as per Maharashtra Co-operative Housing society rules and regulations? Is it not unethic?
Anonymous
01 October 2019 at 14:30
Sir,
Main first floor par rehti hun.Mere upar wale owner jo kareeb one year se yahan aaya hai.Main yahan par 12 sal se reh rahi hoon.unke aane se pehle koi problem nahi thi.Jab yeh aye hai tab se problems ho rahi hai.Upar wale owner ne apni balcony ke bahar jo builder ne elevator lagaya hai.unki balcony ke bahar wale area mein jo elevator hai us area ko plastic ki sheet se cover kar diya hai.Us Par flower pots rakh diye hain..wah plastic sheet uski balcony wall ki taraf se open hai.Jis mein se wah kachra ladies ke hairs aur mare hue cockroach meri balcony mein dalta hai aur pots se mud water meri balcony mein aata hai.Aaj Kal barish ki wajah se meri balcony mein sab mud water jama ho jata hai aur balcony kali ho gayi hai.Meri balcony ki wall mein bhi upar se mud water ke nishan ban gaye hain upar ki diwar bhi kali ho gayi hai.Society mein bhi koi nahi sun raha hai.Police mein bhi complaint ki hai par wah bhi kuch nahi kar rahe hain.
Sir ab main kya karu.Maine video banaya hai. Main Bhej sakti hun Par kahan Bheju Pata nahi.Please meri help kare.
Thanks
Mrs Jagmohini Timothy.
Block A,Divya Teja Apartment
Raghvendra Nagar,Ammuguda,
Sainikpuri Secunderabad-500094
Sagar R Trivedi
01 October 2019 at 12:41
A B & C all are partners in construction firm ABC DEVELOPERS. land are in name of all partners. GST number & exp. credit was taken in FIrm's name(ABC DEVELOPERS). now problem is that, at the time of sale Office, in sale deed saller name will be all partner names Individually. the firms' name not come in any deed or agreement except partnership deed. what should be advice for GST & Income Tax related?
(1) should partners collect GST at the time of sale office??
(2) firm can pay gst credit on behalf of individuals??
Vinesh K Chhaya
01 October 2019 at 01:02
A Multi State Scheduled Bank has possessed an immovable property without application of section 14 SARFAESI Act-2002 and made auction and soldout said property. The borrower filed suit for declaration under CPC, and prayed for cancellation of said transaction and sale certificate including whole process of recovery.
Bank replied and argued that section 34 of SARFAESI applys here, Court allowed argument of bank and suit was dismissed without hearing of application for interm injunction .
My question is when possession of property has taken without any order of District Magistrate under section 14 of SARFAESI Act-2002 then the provision of section 34 sarfaesi act-2002 is applicable or not?
Sureka Nagendhran
30 September 2019 at 18:31
I want clear explanation about consequences of death of one of several defendants in a suit, what is mean by 'right to sue' survives as stated in order 22. when suit is abated, need clear interpretation.
vetrivel
30 September 2019 at 16:02
Hi Sir
I got ex-parte divorce in the month of march, 2019. But i haven't received the divorce decree yet. What is the reason for taking this much time.
When ever i ask my lawyer , he says we will get it soon.
Please advise me why it is taking so long for the court the provide divorce decree ? How can i get it soon?
thanks
Anonymous
30 September 2019 at 15:50
When District court martial concluded I was acting rank of sergeant and A COURT MARTIAL DOES NOT DEAL WITH ACTING RANK as per Air force act sec 73 notes 10.2 a violation of AFA and a complete travesty of justice
Ajay Kochar
30 September 2019 at 13:41
I am living in a society having 168 members located at dombivli Maharashtra. My query is If managing committee not submit the rectification report of FY 17-18 within stipulated period and even after not filling the same they get account approved in AGM from General body for FY 18-19. What impact on managing committee or society member for non filling of rectification report for FY 2017-18. Is there any penalty, fine, etc charges for the same? Even no any singly income tax return they filled from FY 13-14 to 17-18.
Kindly revert on the same.
Ajay Kochar
Member Strength 9,49,514 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Constitution
ayasthan is a state in the Indian Union. Raj Prakash is the Chief Minister of the state. Mrs. Vandana Verma is a member of the Jayasthan Legislative Assembly. Though Mrs. Vandana Verma is member of the ruling party, she is a strong critic of the ruling party. In April 2002 the state witnessed large scale communal riot. According to the news paper reports the riot was the result of a planned scheme implemented under the leadership of a religious fundamentalist group known as ‘Black Tigers’. Certain newspapers published the allegation that the Government had ignored the police intelligence reports about the illegal activities of ‘Black Tigers’, submitted in January 2002. The Opposition parties strongly criticized the inaction of the Government in preventing the riot and demanded the resignation of the Chief Minister. On 8-9-2002 Vandana Verma informed the media persons that she had collected clear evidence regarding the failure of the State Government in performing the constitutional duty of maintenance of law and order. On 9-9-2002 while participating in a discussion in the Legislative Assembly Mrs. Vandana Verma quoted a report submitted by the Inspector General of Police (Intelligence) to the Chief Secretary of the State on 16-1-2002. In the report it was stated that the fundamentalist group ‘Black Tigers’ had chalked out a plan for promoting enmity and hatred between different religious groups in the State. It was suggested that the activities of nearly 200 black listed persons should be closely watched. The name and address and other details were included in the report. The names of two ruling party M.L.A' s were included in the black list. Two ruling party M.L.A s Mr. Sham Manohar and Mr. Jit Kumar strongly denied the allegation against them and alleged that the report of the Inspector General (Intelligence) was not genuine. According to them report was a document fabricated by Mrs. Vandana Verma. However, the Chief Minister confirmerd the genuineness of the report. After the discussion Vandana Verma left the Legislative Assembly Complex and proceeded towards the Legislator's Hostel in a car. However, on the way the police stopped her car and she was arrested by the Deputy Commissioner of Police. On 9-9-2002 Vandana Verma was produced before the First Class Judicial Magistrate and an F.I.R. was filed stating that she was accused of offence under Section 5 of Official Secrets Act. During police investigation no evidence was received other than the fact that Mrs. Vandana Verma has received an intelligence report, which was a secret document. However on, 12-11-2002 police forwarded the final report and the charge was framed against her, for the commission of offence under Section 5 (2) of the Official Secret Act 1923. On 20-11-2002 Vandana Verma filed a petition before the High Court of Jayasthan for quashing the Final Report of Police and thus charges against her, excercising the powers of the High Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner contended that the criminal case against her was politically motivated. It was further contended that since she had the privileges under Art. 194 (2) of the Constitution, no action could be taken against her. One the same day a writ petition was filed by Vandana Verma challenging the constitutional validity of Section 5 of the Official Secrets Act 1923 on the ground that the provision is against the basic concepts of democracy including "Rule of Law", "Open Government", "Freedom of Information" and "Freedom of Press". It was specially contended that Section 5 violates Art 14, Art 19 (1) (a) and Art 21 of the Constitution. The single Judges referred the petition to the Chief Justice stating that the issues involved in the petitions may be decided by a larger bench. On 29-11-2002 Chief Justice constituted a Full Bench for the adjudication of the petitions filed by Mrs. Vandana Verma on 20-11-2002. what points can be
Plzz help me with this case