Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

SANKET BAGADE   27 August 2021 at 21:18

Eligibility for govt exam who has faced ufm [cheating]

After a lot of year I got a Central government job. So there is a question in attestation form that... Have you ever been debarred from any university examination ? Yes/No ? I faced ufm(unfair means) in university exam during my college days will if affect my govt job now

valji   27 August 2021 at 20:02

Sra name correction

IN SRA MY GRANDFATHER NAME AS ENTERED AS A MY FATHER NAME , HOW I CAN CORRECT THE SAME ,

Anonymous   27 August 2021 at 18:50

Leave and license agreement

Hello, Am resident of Ahmedabad and want my house in cooperative housing society to rent out on 5 years leave and license agreement to a proprietary firm. My queries are;

1. Can I give residential property on commercial leave and license agreement for 5 years
2. Apart from paying stamp duty and registration what other formalities are needed to formally close the deed

Anonymous   27 August 2021 at 17:41

Sslc ಟಿ.ಸಿ ಯಲ್ಲಿ ಜಾತಿ ತಿದ್ದುಪಡಿ ಕುರಿತು .

Sir/Medom,
ನನ್ನ ಹೆಸುರು ರವಿಕುಮಾರ್ .ಎಸ್ ನಮ್ಮದು ಕೊಪ್ಪಳ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ ಗಂಗಾವತಿ ತಾಲೂಕ ಗಂಗಾವತಿ.ನಮ್ಮ ತಂದೆ ಅವರು ನನ್ನ SSLC ಟಿ.ಸಿ ಯಲ್ಲಿ ಯರಕುಲ ST ಎಂದು ಬರಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ .ಯರಕುಲ ಎಂಬುವುದು ಆಂಧ್ರಪ್ರದೇಶ ರಾಜ್ಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಬರುವಂತಹದು. ನಮ್ಮ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕದಲ್ಲಿ ಕೊರಚ SC ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ ಜಾತಿ ವರ್ಗಕ್ಕೆ ಸೇರಿರುತ್ತದೆ.ಇವೆರೆಡು ಒಂದೇ ಜಾತಿ ಆಗಿರುತ್ತದೆ.ನನ್ನ SSLC ವರ್ಗಾವಣೆ ಪ್ರಮಾಣ ಪತ್ರದಲ್ಲಿ ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ ಜಾತಿ SC ಕೊರಚ ಎಂದು ನಮೂದಿಸಬೇಕು ತಿದ್ದುಪಡಿ ಮಾಡಬೇಕು .ಇದಕ್ಕೆ ಪರಿಹಾರವನ್ನು ತಿಳಿಸಬೇಕು ಎಂದು ನಿಮ್ಮಲ್ಲಿ ಕೇಳುಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತೇನೆ.

suneetha Jain   27 August 2021 at 15:41

Non disclosure of pending case at time of joining govt job

In Avtar Singh Vs Union of India Case, Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has given Judgment given on 21.07.2016. In that Judgment, 11 points are mentioned by Hon'ble Supreme Court regarding non disclosure of pending cases while applying for Govt Jobs. I would like to know the view of Hon'ble Supreme Court through you (experts) because point no 1 (38.1) says that the candidate should disclose the details of pending cases. But point no 4.1 (38.4.1) says that in case of trivial cases, even though the candidate did not disclose the details of pending cases, it can be condoned. I would like to know whether the judgment is in favor of employee or employer. Because, based on point no 1, Employer can terminate the employee in case of non disclosure of cases. Again based on point 4.1, Employee can have the right to get back his job in case of non disclosure of cases. Please clarify my doubt

Anonymous   27 August 2021 at 04:28

Does ufm(unfair means) makes u unfit for govt exams

I have been selected for govt exam, I faced ufm(unfair means) in university exam in College days and now in the attestion form I have to answer it
Will it affect my job ??

Abiral Pandey   27 August 2021 at 00:15

Seniority in case of technical resignation

I am a central govt. employee in GST department. I had resigned on technical resignation from the post of Inspector, GST Mumbai zone and joined as Inspector, GST Bhopal zone. My query is whether promotional seniority should be protected in this case as the Department and Designation has not changed.

Dopt has brought out Master circular 28020 / two (read numeric 2)/ 2018 - Estt(c) dtd 27.08.2018 in this regard where in point no. 8 about Seniority mentions that

" On technical resignation seniority in the post held by the Government servant on substantive basis continues to be protected. However, in case of a Government servant deciding to rejoin his susbstantive post, the period spent in the another Department which he had joined after submitting his technical resignation will not count for minimum qualifying service for promotion in the higher post"

Guidance please.

sushmita   26 August 2021 at 19:50

Requesting clarification of the phrase in the divorce notice

My divorce case is in the court. My husband is the petitioner and am the respondent. we are HINDUs.

"Infact all the stridhana property and jewels are with the petitioner's custody with the hope the petitioner would comes out of the tactics played by the petitioner's parents and his brother to break the matrimonial relationship with the respondent and the petitioner."

1) Can you clarify if the above phrase means all stridhana property and all jewels with the petitioner? Or all the stridhana property and some jewels with the petitioner?
2) Is there anything wrong if i say all stridhana property and some 35 sovereigns of gold jewels are with the petitioner? will it contradict with the above phrase?

My lawyer has put the above phrase in our legal notice and am trying to understand how the judge will interpret the same.

Also i did not wanted to say all the gold jewels of my stridhana are with the petitioner. I just wanted to say some jewels are with him.
So, trying to check with you lawyers if there is any issue in saying so if the judge asks about it or the petitioner's lawyer crosses me during the case.

Thanks in advance.

DEEPAK DHAMEJA   26 August 2021 at 13:23

Ipc 283

I HAVE REQUESTED POLICE STATION TO REGISTER FIR UNDER IPC 283
AS SOME VEGETABLE SELLERS BLOCK THE ENTRANCE OF MY SHOP.
SO PLEASE TELL ME IN HOW MUCH DAYS THEY HAVE TO FILE CHARGE SHEET AND GIVE ME SOME PREMILINARY INFORMATION REGARDING IPC 283. AND ITS PROCEDINGDS
THANKS

4WhatIsRight   26 August 2021 at 08:21

Private limited company buying litigated property below circ

In 2012, a Private limted company bought a property for Rs.1000000 (ten lakh) and paid vide demand draft. Deed of conveyance was executed but couldn't be registered on that day. Seller returned the demand draft with a promise to get the deed registered and collect the demand draft at a later date. Thereafter seller refused to get the deed registered and handover physical possession of the property. Company approached court for specific performance of contract and got injunction on sale transfer of property by seller. Case is in trial stage. Now the seller has approached for compromise and offers to execute a fresh deed and handover possession for Rs.1500000 (fifteen lakh). market value for stamp duty is now (2021) Rs.2250000/-(twenty two lakh fifty thousand). What would be income tax implication for buyer company? How compromise process should be followed in this matter to avoid tax liability?