Anonymous
03 September 2022 at 20:47
Mr. Abdul contacted Smt. Mohini to purchase his land, both entered into agreement for Rs. 5 lakhs (un-registered) witnessed by Mr. Kiran and Smt. Gowri. Abdul requested the Vendee to give maxm amount of Rs. 4lakhs as he was in dire need of money. After receipt of said money he left to his native place in Krishna District. Did not turning up to take balance amount and registration.
Smt. Mohini requested many times and got served legal notice to Abdul, and he refused. Then Smt. Mohini Sent notices to witnesses of the transaction Mr. Kiran and Smt. Gowri, asking them to suggest the Vendor to complete the transaction at the sooner, they too refused to receive the notices.
The Vendee Smt. Mohini was under loss and stress due the the act of the Vendor.
How Can she get register the site in her name
under what provisions of law she can approach the court of law and against whom Smt. Mohini can sue for remedy
Syed Athaulla
03 September 2022 at 20:33
GPA site is not registered Hi sir, My father has purchased the site through gpa notary but not registered in 2007 later he registered the site through sale deed with same as purchaser and buyer after that he again gift deed to my mother. Is the site valid to sale the site yo third party or do we require the signature if the gpa holder . Thank you
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/experts_profile.asp?member_id=5573
Anonymous
03 September 2022 at 19:42
My father had bought a house and sale deed was executed on my sisters's name. That time her age was 15 years.
He put that property on my sister's name due to sentiment. When he was alive , he used to stay that me and my sister should share equally even though that property is on my sister's name.
Recently my father passed away. He did not leave any WILL. Legal heirs are my mother , sister and myself.
Now my sister is saying that house is her individual property and does not want give my share in that property.
Could you please suggest me how can I get my share in that house legally ? Can i file for partition suite ?
Anonymous
03 September 2022 at 19:23
We reside in a bungalow built by our great grand father in 1935
This is owned by 3 sisters and one brother of my father and my father
But only we are staying here So we are residential owners
Property card have name of our father and other siblings
Our father passed away in 22 July
Can co owners push us into redevelopment
We don't want to do redevelopment
NAGARAJ
03 September 2022 at 18:03
my client name is manjula she was studied at shivmogga till 10th class and now her name changed as vinutha in her adhaar card, present adhaar card address is stands at bangalore.. shall i file declaration suit for name change at bangalore jurisdiction courts...?
Thanks for ur precious reply.
K P V Raju
03 September 2022 at 09:10
Sir This is Raju Inspectòr Admin Central Crime Station, Detective Dept of Hyderabad City.
Some important cases transferred to CCS from local police stations. Meantime jurisdictions court of Local PS are not sending original FIR n complaint to the court designated for CCS cases. What is the legal procedure and latest judgements related to the query may be furnished. Also explain sec 408 of CrPC. Thank u
Anonymous
03 September 2022 at 00:12
I have eight year of experience in PSU, IDA pay matrix, i had applied in AIIMS (Autonomous Body) as Direct Recruitment where 5 years of experience is the essential criteria. I had applied through proper channel after selection, i relieved from PSU as technical resignation with lien and i joined the AIIMS. But they consider me as a fresher, i wrote an application to Adminstration and requested to protect my basic pay and give me pay protection as all rules and regulation in AIIMS are same as Central Government employees. However, after three months passed they never respond. AIIMS consider me as a fresh recruitment. Now i started my job from zero level.
Please suggest, what would i do.
Jayant
02 September 2022 at 22:32
Delhi Police Recruitment 2020
total no of.post 5690
final results declared on 15 Dec 2021
A 10% reserve panel of total vacancy (means 569 candidate other than 5690) also maintained by SSC for those who didn't want to join Delhi police or found PVR adverse or any other reason or found ineligible at any stage. At that vacant seat chance will be given to reserve panel candidates.
SSC declared 5076 candidate are fair and 614 are suspect in malpractice or any other illigal activity during exam so 614 kept withheld.
5076 candidate joined and SSC investigate 614 withheld candidate.
after investigation SSC Declare out of 614 candidate 125 candidates are fair and 489 candidate are found malpractice and keep again withheld.
125 candidate joined and file of 489 malpractice candidate handover to Delhi Police Crime branch .
Delhi police crime branch investigate 489 withheld candidates CCTV footage and computer server and found they do 50questions in 2 minutes 25 maths question in 3 minutes and surprise is that all questions are right DP Crime branch send notice to these 489 candidates and these candidates accept their fraud
According to notification any vacant seat out of 5690 by any reason ( like candidate resign , candidate death during training , not join , find ineligible ) 10% Reserve panel candidates can claim these vacant seats
My question is that
According to SSC their is no any rule or procedure to fill the vacant seat of withheld candidate who found malpractice
but according to notification it's reserve panel right to claim that seat
can we file a case in CAT Delhi to claim these seats against DP and SSC
PLEASE reply sir
Due to my English you confuse at any point you can mail me it's an humble request sir
jayant442263@gmail.com
Pendyala Vasudeva Rao
02 September 2022 at 21:14
LR petition is pending in declaration suit. Respondents not filed counter since 1200 days. Court not forefrited the right of respondents. Already 5 defendents set exparty. O 8, R 10 petition filed by plaintiff.Can the court pronounce the judgement in favour of plaintiff? How?
Member Strength 9,51,531 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Forcible acts of endowment employees and crooked archaka
Respected Members Good evening
Please guide me in the following
A man krishna rao running small shop since 50 years, adjacent to satyanarayana swami temple compound wall, which has been let to him by one Gorongo Goudo and said goudo was died 30 years back.
Infact Hanumanth bukta was heridatory trustee of the private temple, archakas appointed by their ancestrals occupied the temple then said Hanumanth bukta filed suit in 1908 for posession inrespect of temple and won the case. subsequently with interference of locals, entered into agreement with archakas gouranga panda and other and handed over the diety and other articles, with an understanding that archaks should return the same whenevery asked by the Hanumanth bukta or his family. after the death of said hanumanth bukta, the family members of archakas settled the temple properties among themselves without any right. later there were cases among the archakas regarding the right over the temple in the year 1998 and 2001 & 2010 and all were dismissed. Lower court found that parties to suits do not have right over the temple, given a direction to Assistant Commissioner Endowments to take over the same. The order of the lower court challenged in appeal and in said appeal the appellate court deleted the part of lower courts order directing the Asst. Endowments Commissiioner "to hand over the posession" has been deleted. Hence the Endowments dept. nothing to do with said temple.
As per the understanings between the families of archakas.....four families collecting the rentals of four shops adjacent to compound wall of the temple.
Recently one of the archaka hardly trying to eliminate the others.....gathered some local people, injucted them to widen the main entrance (simhadwara of the temple). So that the shop under the supervision of another archaka can easily be removed. On the other side there was shop under the supervision of said archaka, but with his cunning nature he left the area of his shop, spreaded construction towards the area of the shop under the super vision of another archaka, executed his plan successfully, constructed dwaram with malafied intention.. Colluded with the staff of Endowments Dept. harassing the Petty Vendor.
approached Dist.legal Services authority, praying to remove / vacate the shop by submitting a representation mentioning the Municipal commissioner, Dist.Collector and Endowments Dept as respondents, praying to direct the authorities to remove the shop. the same is violative and against to right of living. Repeatedly the Endowments staff harassing the petty shop owner to vacate and threatning that they will evict and throw the goods forcibly. Infact said temple is not under the Endowments Department, but unlawfully interfering in the issue to support the archaka, locked the shop and tried to demolish the structure, who is a forcible man. other departments having careful inquiry kept quite in the issue. Police did not given support to the Petty Vendor, but orally suggested the Endowments staff not to do so without any right.
Devotees are not insisting for widening the existing door, but the crooked mentality archaka pinching some locals in his support and to take legal shelter approached Dist.Legal Services Authority with the help of some of Court Staff.
issue is pending with Dist Legal Services Authority
Dist.Legal Services Authority orally asking the petty vendor to vacate the shop without going through facts. Said Petty vendor was feared and disturbed. If he vacates the shop his family will suffer on roads for livelihood.
How said petty vendor can get help by approaching court, can he file a suit for injunction against the endowment authorities and archaka to restrict their forcible activities. Petty Vendor needs immediate help for survival