Quashing of proceedings u/s 498-A, IPC

Section 498A of the IPC reads as follows:

            "498A. Husband or relative of husband of a woman  subjecting her to cruelty.  Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the            shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which  may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.  Explanation-For the purpose of this section, "cruelty"  means-

  (a) Any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is  likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause  grave injury or danger to life, limb or health whether  mental or physical) of the woman; or

  (b) Harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her  to meet any unlawful demand for any property or   valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her meet such demand".

         The said section contains an explanation, which defines "cruelty" as understood under Section 498A IPC.   In order to understand the meaning of the expression `cruelty' as envisaged under Section 498A, there must be such a conduct on the part of the husband or relatives of the husband of woman which is of such a nature as to cause the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health whether mental or physical of the woman.

         Where  the marriage  was performed on 23.10.1997 when it is alleged that Rs. 5 lakhs was given by the parents of wife to the family of husband as dowry; the FIR was filed in the month of April, 2002 and in the said FIR there is no allegation that subsequent thereto any harassment was made by the appellant with a view to coercing her or any person related to wife to meet any unlawful demand or any property , neither explanation (a) nor explanation (b) of Section 498 A of IPC is attracted. When it  is crystal clear that neither in the FIR nor in the charge sheet there is any ingredient of Section 498A IPC, which could prima facie constitute a case of cruelty as defined in that Section, it can be concluded that no case under Section 498A is made out on the face of the record, and therefore, both the FIR as also the charge sheet are liable to be quashed in exercise of the powers under Section 482 of the CrPC.

(See, Shakson Belthissor  v.  State of Kerala & Anr decided by supreme court on 06/07/2009)