Comments on PSBs not complying with SC judgements

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 in 1 pages

dr g balakrishnan

dr g balakrishnan

Wrote on 19 October 2016  

Move the contempt application on the relevant bank under Art 32 before the Supreme court that the relevant bank by resorting to revision applications deny pensions to you, then also refer L. Chandrakumar v UOI case wherein the 7 member bench declared 'pension' is the pensioner's property that is again a fundamental right read under Art 31 r/w Art 300A.



murthypgk

murthypgk

Wrote on 18 October 2016  

Unless National Litigation Policy including at the State level is notified by Govt(s),people especially the pensioners will be the maximum sufferers.Dear Khanna ji, pl take some lead towards a PIL if possible.I am with you. PGK MURTHY,Hyderabad


You need to be logged in to post comment






×

  LAWyersclubindia Menu

web analytics