- Supreme Court Highlights The Purpose Of Court Fees: There Is No Justification For The State To Profit Excessively From High Court Fees Or To Generate Revenue For General Administration.
- Trade Union's Entitlement for Permanent Employment under Bombay Model Standing Order Upheld
- Deciding On Ad Valorem Court Fees Discrepancies By Delhi Trial Court And Further By High Court.
- Supreme Court's Ruling on Anticipatory Bail: A Matter of Discretion and Error by Lower Court
- Limitation Of Article 136: The Jurisdiction Of The Supreme Court To Grant Special Leave To Appeal Can Be Invoked In Very Exceptional Circumstances
- Judgment Analysis Of Indira Jaising Vs. Supreme Court Of India: A Comprehensive Study Of Public Interest Litigation
- The Supreme Court Ruled That Article 239-aa(3)(a) States That The Legislative Assembly Of Nctd Possesses The Authority To Enact Laws Regarding Matters Mentioned In The State List And Concurrent List, Applicable To Union Territories, Except For Entries 1, 2, And 18 Of List Ii, And Entries 64, 65, And 66 Of List Ii
- The Supreme Court Ruled That Article 239-aa(3)(a) States That The Legislative Assembly Of Nctd Possesses The Authority To Enact Laws Regarding Matters Mentioned In The State List And Concurrent List, Applicable To Union Territories, Except For Entries 1, 2, And 18 Of List Ii, And Entries 64, 65, And 66 Of List Ii
- State Of Rajasthan Vs. Vishakha: Pioneering Women's Rights And The Power Of Pil In India Leading To The Formation Of Vishakha Guidelines.
- Supreme Court Emphasized That The Burden Of Proving Negligence Lies With The Claimants, And The Standard Of Proof Is Based On The Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt.
|