WHAT DID THE COURT SAY? In Mohd Muslim @ Hussain v. State (Nct Of Delhi), the Supreme Court of India held that laws which impose strict restrictions on the grant of bail are necessary for the public interest but proper attention needs to be paid to e ..
WHAT DID THE COURT SAY? In Prasanta Kumar Sahoo & Ors. v Charulata Sahu & Ors., the Supreme Court of India held that if a final decree has not been passed and the case is still pending, then the parties to that case can get the benefit of th ..
WHAT DID THE COURT SAY? In Narayan Singh & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., the Rajasthan High Court has imposed a cost of Rs. 50,000/- on the petitioners for abusing PIL jurisdiction in furtherance of their vested interests for quarry lice ..
The Union Ministry of Law and Justice has notified the appointment of Chief Justices in Allahabad, Patna and Chattisgarh High Courts. Justice Pritinker Diwaker has been appointed Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court. While Justice Ramesh Sinha a ..
Hon’ble Chief Justice of India Mr DY Chandrachud made headlines this week after he confessed his personal aversion towards sealed cover. He refused to accept the sealed cover note submitted on behalf of the Central Government and contended that ..
WHAT DID THE COURT SAY? In Noorjahan @ Noori v. State of Madhya Pradesh, the Supreme Court granted bail to the petitioner who was a law intern at the Indore Court. She was arrested on January 29, 2023, for offences punishable u/s 419, 420 and 120B I ..
What Did The Centre Say In the Eastern Coalfields Limited And Others v Ajit Mondal & Others, the Supreme Court of India exercised its power under Article 142 of the Indian Constitution to extend justice to a poor line mazdoor, who was wrongfully ..
What Did The Centre Say In Vinu Madhavan v. State Bank of India, the Kerala High Court held that if the borrower has fully paid the loan amount, then the bank cannot withhold security documents of a mortgaged property on the grounds that during the t ..
A delegation of the Supreme Court of Kenya which was led by the Hon'ble Chief Justice Martha Koome visited India last week. They were invited to the Rashtrapati Bhavan where they met President Droupadi Murmu along with Professor SP Singh Baghel, ..
What Did The Centre Say In Supriyo @ Supriyo Chakraborthy v. Union of India, the Centre said that union of two people of opposite genders is a prerequisite for marriage. Hetrosexual marriages have always been the norm in India and will always be the ..
Member Strength 9,46,665 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
