Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

  • The Canada Supreme Court in a recent judgment held that the country’s mandatory and lifetime registration against the sex offender register was unconstitutional.
  • The national sex offender registry created in 2004 under the Sex Offender Information Registration Act (SOIRA) which had a mandatory registry of sex offenders was upheld invalid.
  • When the law changed in 2011, the prosecution was to apply earlier to a judge for including a name in the registry.
  • Ever since the amendment, Section 490.012 of the Criminal Code mandates the registration of anyone who is found to be guilty of a sexual offense.
  • Section 490.013(2.1) also provides for compulsory registration for life for those who committed more than one sexual offence.
  • As per the case brief prepared by the communications staff of the Supreme Court, in the writing of the majority of judges, Justice Andromache Karakatsanis and Justice Sheilah L Martin, held that the before-mentioned provisions of the Criminal Code are violative of Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that it cannot be justified in a free and democratic society.
  • The judges observed that the provisions infringe the right to liberty under Section 7 of the Charter as registration impacts freedom of movement and fundamental choices of people who are not at potential risk of re-offending.
  • As per Section 7 of the Charter, everyone has a right to life, liberty, security of the person, and the right not to be deprived except by principles of fundamental justice.
  • The majority of the judges declared the provisions unconstitutional.
  • Supreme Court communications staff said that it has been informed that the invalidity of Section 490.012 is to take effect in a year and the finding for Section 490.01(2.1) will take effect immediately along with being rendered invalid from 2011, the time it was enacted.
  • Eugene Ndhlovuin, in 2015 challenged the validity of Sections 490.012 and 490.013(2.1) and pleaded guilty to two offences of sexual assault against two persons at a party when he was 19 years old, 4 years earlier.
  • He was punished with six months imprisonment and his name was added to the national sex offender registry automatically.
"Loved reading this piece by Kavya Sri?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"




Tags :

  Views  67  Report



Comments
img