High Court Under Article 226 Cannot Permit Party To Modify Its Offer Without Hearing Other Parties
The case was of Vaibhavi Enterprise v. Nobel Cera Coat Limited and Tanish Cerachem Private Limited v. Nobel Cera Coat Limited. The decision was given by Justices MR Shah and AS Bopanna. The Court held that the High Courts under Article 226 could not permit a party to modify its offer without hearing other parties.
What do you think about this case?
Financial Autonomy Of The Judiciary Is An Integral Part If We Want A Different Outcome From Our Judicial System
CJI N V Ramana stated that a proposal has been sent for the establishment of the National Judicial Infrastructure Authority to the Ministry of Law and Justice. He stated that if we want a different outcome from the judicial system, we cannot continue to work in these circumstances. An integral aspect, in this regard, is the financial autonomy of the judiciary.
What do you think about this case?
Distinction Between Tax And Fee Has Been Substantially Removed
The case was of Jalkal Vibhag Nagar Nigam and Ors v. Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation &Anr. The decision was given by Justices DY Chandrachud, Vikram Nath and B V Nagarathna. In this case, the court observed that levy under Section 52 (1) is a tax and not a fee and it is a tax on lands and buildings within the meaning of Entry 49 of List II.
What do you think about this case?
Requirement To File Certificate Of A Senior Advocate Along With Curative Petition Mandatory
The case was of Rajesh Jha v. State of Uttar Pradesh. The decision was given by Justice Hima Kohli. The Supreme Court observed that filing of certificate of a Senior Advocate along with curative petition is a mandatory requirement.
What do you think about this case?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"
