Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

WHAT DID THE COURT SAY

  • The Karnataka High Court directed the State to decide on providing video conferencing facilities to both Judicial and Quasi judicial bodies.
  • The decision was given by the Division Bench consisting of Chief Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Suraj Govindaraj.
  • The provisions in the Disaster Management Act were considered.
  • It was stated that all authorities must be well equipped in view of the approaching third wave of COVID 19.

WHAT WERE THE DIRECTIONS GIVEN

  • Priority was to be given to Quasi Judicial bodies for providing video conferencing facilities.
  • The State was directed to identify all the Quasi Judicial bodies first.
  • Judicial bodies were to be equipped with the video conferencing technologies in a phased manner.
  • It has been directed that the State has to give a statement by July 13 on this matter.
  • The State also has to disclose whether there are any existing Quasi Judicial bodies with this kind of video conferencing setup.

BACKGROUND

  • This direction was given when the Court was listening to a petition which was highlighting the issue of illegal construction.
  • The petition is pending before the Assistant Commissioner under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act.
  • A time extension to file the appeal has been given by the Court, to the Assistant Commissioner.
  • Appeals have to be filed by 6th August 2021.


What do you think about this case? Let us know about your thoughts and opinions down in the comment section!

"Loved reading this piece by Brinda Kundu?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"




Tags :

  Views  39  Report



Comments
img