Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

WHAT WAS THE CASE

  • Filmmaker Aisha Sulthana made remarks about the Government using ‘bio-weapons’ during a channel discussion.
  • This led to a BJP worker filing a complaint against her.
  • She has given an explanation on social media and has offered an apology.
  • Senior Advocate P Vijayabhanu is expected to represent Sulthana in this case.

WHAT WERE THE CHARGES

  • An FIR has been registered under Section 124 A which deals with sedition and Section 153 B which deals with acts done against national integration.
  • The filmmaker has been issued a notice under Section 41 A CrPC asking her to appear for the case investigation.
  • A bail application under Section 438 of the CrPC has also been filed.

WHAT WAS THE PLEA

  • Aisha Sulthana has approached the Kerala HC for grant of an anticipatory bail.
  • She contends that the ‘bio-weapon’ remark was referring to criticising the administration’s move to loosen COVID protocols.
  • As held in the Kedarnath case, mere criticism of the Government is not equivalent to sedition as there was no element that would incite violence.
  • The remarks were aimed at the reforms introduced and not to create violence and unrest.

What do you think of this case? Tell us down in the comments.

"Loved reading this piece by Brinda Kundu?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"




Tags :

  Views  64  Report



Comments
img