Civil Law Judgements

Displaying 50 - 60 of 567 in 57 pages

Seeking permission to withdraw petition to file fresh petition is allowable

 26 July 2012

Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after impleading all the necessary parties. Permission, as above, is granted.

Posted in Civil Law |    0 comments |   1061 hits

Rule 52 empowers the State Government to sanction a lease or sale of nazul land for particular purpose at particular rate keeping in view the circumstances of the case

 23 July 2012

Respondent No.1 filed Writ Petition No.11 of 1995 for quashing tender notice dated 20.12.1994 on the ground that the same was contrary to the Zonal Development Plan prepared under the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 and prayed that a ma

Posted in Civil Law |    0 comments |   3230 hits

When a land is acquired having potentiality to developed into urban land eligible to pay higher rate of compensation

 23 July 2012

The appellants did not file application under Section 18 of the Act for determination of compensation by the Court, but after amendment of the Act with effect from 24.9.1984 and disposal of the references made at the instance of other landowners, the

Posted in Civil Law |    0 comments |   1820 hits

As per chapter III schedule I panchayat can make provision likely to promote advantages of local people and sec 178 empower the Director to act according to panchayat

 21 July 2012

M/s. Kay Jay Constructions Company Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter described as, ‘the company’) (respondent No.4 in the appeal arising out of SLP (C) No.1758 of 2011) was granted permission by the appellant in 2006 for raising construction on property bearing

Posted in Civil Law |    0 comments |   1169 hits

Escalation of price cannot be considered as force majeure event providing it with the defence of non performance of its obligation

 21 July 2012

Coastal Andhra Power Limited (‘CAPL’) has filed this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘Act’) against the Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution Company Limited (‘APCPDCL’), Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distrib

Posted in Civil Law |    0 comments |   1923 hits

A person is free to file his representation regarding the claim of excess pyment made by him

 20 July 2012

The petitioner has approached this Court with certain grievances with regard to the amount payable to the second/third respondent. In view of the intervening developments, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, prays for an opportunity t

Posted in Civil Law |    0 comments |   702 hits

Mere pendency of the writ petition should not disentitle the petitioner from the benefits flowing out of the order under challenge in the present writ petition

 19 July 2012

The facts, as disclosed from the record, in a nut-shell are that the original applicant was initially recruited as Supporting Staff Grade-I on 25.7.1979 by the 1st respondent and subsequently promoted as Supporting Staff Grade-II on 4.10.1996. In the

Posted in Civil Law |    0 comments |   969 hits

Observation made for disposal of bail petition same shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the meritof the case

 19 July 2012

It has been stated that Baba Pritam Shah executed his last Will dated 15.8.2011 in favour of Dharma Shah. The Will was scribed by Sanjeev Kumar and attested by Nikka Ram and Kewal Krishan. The complainant Satpal reported the matter to the police on t

Posted in Civil Law |    0 comments |   1000 hits

According to Order VII Rule 11, Rule 14(1) and Rule 14(2) that in the absence any cause of action suit cannot be proceed

 18 July 2012

On 07.01.1990, the appellant-Society (first defendant), the owner of the property situated at Door No. 35, Lock Street, Kottur, Chennai entered into an Agreement for Sale of the property in favour of one S. Velayutham - 2nd defendant in the suit on t

Posted in Civil Law |    0 comments |   1988 hits

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ( Taj Heritage Corridor Project case ) petitioner- Mayawati

 12 July 2012

The only question raised in this writ petition, filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, is as to whether FIR lodged under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against the petitioner herein to

Posted in Civil Law |    0 comments |   1810 hits


  LAWyersclubindia Menu

Indian Evidence Act     |    x